Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29475451›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2018

Measuring behavior across scales.

Gordon J Berman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. FERAL: A Video-Understanding System for Direct Video-to-Behavior Mapping.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Behavioral sequences across multiple animal species in the wild share common structural features.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gordon J BermanDepartment of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, 30322, GA, USA. gordon.berman@emory.edu.

Funding

CRCNS:Predictability as a New Paradigm for Rodent Social NeurobiologyR01MH115831 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BERMAN, GORDON JOSEPH, LIU, ROBERT C · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
National Institute of Mental Health (US) 1R01MH115831-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for high-throughput, precise, and meaningful methods for measuring behavior has been amplified by our recent successes in measuring and manipulating neural circuitry. The largest challenges associated with moving in this direction, however, are not technical but are instead conceptual: what numbers should one put on the movements an animal is performing (or not performing)? In this review, I will describe how theoretical and data analytical ideas are interfacing with recently-developed computational and experimental methodologies to answer these questions across a variety of contexts, length scales, and time scales. I will attempt to highlight commonalities between approaches and areas where further advances are necessary to place behavior on the same quantitative footing as other scientific fields.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLocomotionNerve NetPostureStereotyped Behavior

Identifiers

PMID29475451
PMCPMC5824583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.