ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2018
Barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation among parents of children with pediatric neuromuscular disorders.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Societal participation in the development of orphan drugs: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Return of participant-level clinical trial results to participants: pilot of a simplified centralised approach.BMJ open · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of an Interactive, Educational Website Developed for Adolescents to Learn About Pediatric Clinical Trials: DigiKnowIt News.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersTrial
- Parent and professional experiences of a clinical trial of prenatal and postnatal stem cell therapy for severe osteogenesis imperfecta.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Mitigating the impact of study-start delays in clinical trials for rare disorders: insights and lessons from a PKAN trial.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Feasibility, Safety, and Tolerability of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Engaging Red River Métis families in Manitoba in the development of child health resources - findings from a qualitative study.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Anything is better than nothing': exploring attitudes towards novel therapies in leukodystrophy clinical trials.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Barriers to diverse clinical trial participation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Engaging Hispanic/Latina caregivers and health professionals.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- What influences trust in and understanding of clinical trials? An analysis of information and communication technology use and online health behavior from the Health Information National Trends Survey.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Article
- Parental attitudes and perceptions towards the recruitment of children to clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes of Clinical Trials among Patients with Rare Diseases and the Guardians in China.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Assessing attitudes towards pediatric research participation across diverse populations: Psychometric properties of a novel tool.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Article
- Factors Associated with Eczema Clinical Trial Awareness, Interest, and Participation in Adults.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Article
- Investigating attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy for spinal muscular atrophy.Prenatal diagnosis · 2022Article
- The involvement of rare disease patient organisations in therapeutic innovation across rare paediatric neurological conditions: a narrative review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- An online survey to assess parents' preferences for learning about child health research.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Characteristics of Clinical Trial Participants with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Data from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Lessons Learned from Discontinued Clinical Developments in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsPediatric rare disease presents a challenging situation of high unmet need and a limited pool of potential clinical trial participants. Understanding perspectives of parents of children who have not participated in trials may facilitate approaches to optimize participation rates. The objective of this study was to explore factors associated with parental interest in enrolling children with pediatric neuromuscular disorders in clinical trials.
methodsParents of individuals with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy were recruited through advocacy organizations, a registry, and clinics. These parents ( N = 203) completed a questionnaire including assessments of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation, parents' interest in trial participation, and their perceptions of others' views about participation in a clinical trial.
resultsTrial interest in participating parents was high (64% combined group). The most highly endorsed barrier to participation was the possibility of receiving placebo, followed by not having enough information on risks and trial procedures. Compared to parents of children with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy, parents of children with spinal muscular atrophy endorsed significantly more information and knowledge barriers. The greatest facilitators of participation were (1) confidence in improving disease understanding and (2) guarantee to receive the treatment after a successful trial. A logistic regression model, χ
conclusionWe found high parental interest in pediatric neuromuscular trials that was tempered by concerns about the potential for randomization to a placebo arm. Participants perceived that their trial participation would be facilitated by additional education and guidance from their clinicians. Yet, intentions were negatively associated with frequency of provider communication, perhaps reflecting waning parental interest with a greater understanding of limitations in trial access, increased sophistication in their understanding of trial design, and appreciation of potential burden. To support parents' informed decisions, it is important to educate them to evaluate the quality of research, as well as providing lay information explaining the use of placebo, trial processes, and potential barriers to long-term drug access. Our findings should inform the development of targeted educational content, clinician training, and decision support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.