Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29475073›Full record

ArticleAppetite2018

Development and preliminary validation of the Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ).

K K Davison, C E Blake, A Kachurak, J C Lumeng, D L Coffman, A L Miller, S O Hughes, T G Power, A F Vaughn, R E Blaine and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ): Development and Test-Retest Reliability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Association between snack parenting style and dental caries status of children aged 7-8 years: a sequential mixed method approach.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

K K DavisonHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02445, USA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02445, USA. Electronic address: kdavison@hsph.harvard.edu.
C E BlakeUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
A KachurakTemple University, Center for Obesity Research and Education, 3323 N Broad St, Suite 175, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
J C LumengUniversity of Michigan, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, 300 North Ingalls Street, 10th Floor, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
D L CoffmanTemple University, Center for Obesity Research and Education, 3323 N Broad St, Suite 175, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
A L MillerUniversity of Michigan, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
S O HughesUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 1100 Bates Ave, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
T G PowerWashington State University, Department of Human Development, PO Box 644852, Pullman, WA 99164-4852, USA.
A F VaughnUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 1700 Martin L. King Jr. Blvd, CB 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, USA.
R E BlaineCalifornia State University, Long Beach, Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90840-0501, USA.
N YounginerUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
J O FisherTemple University, Center for Obesity Research and Education, 3323 N Broad St, Suite 175, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

Funding

Snacking in young children: parental definitions, goals, and feeding practicesR21HD074554 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI DAVISON, KIRSTEN, FISHER, JENNIFER ORLET · 2013 to 2014
$445k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD074554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snacking makes significant contributions to children's dietary intake but is poorly understood from a parenting perspective. This research was designed to develop and evaluate the psychometrics of a theoretically grounded, empirically-informed measure of snack parenting. The Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ) was developed using a conceptual model derived from current theory and mixed-methods research to include 20 hypothesized snack parenting practices along 4 parenting dimensions (autonomy support, structure, coercive control and permissiveness). Expert panel evaluation and cognitive interviews were used to refine items and construct definitions. The initial instrument of 105 items was administered to an ethnically diverse, low-income sample of 305 parents (92% mothers) of children aged 1-6 y participating in three existing cohort studies. The sample was randomly split into two equal samples. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted with the first sample to identify snack parenting practices within each parenting dimension, followed by confirmatory factor analysis with the second sample to test the hypothesized factor structure. Internal consistency of sub-scales and associations with existing measures of food parenting practices and styles and child weight status were evaluated. The final P-SNAQ scale included 51 items reflecting 14 snack parenting practices across four parenting dimensions. The factor structure of the P-SNAQ was consistent with prior theoretical frameworks. Internal consistency coefficients were good to very good for 12 out of 14 scales and subscale scores were moderately correlated with previously validated measures. In conclusion, initial evidence suggests that P-SNAQ is a psychometrically sound measure for evaluating a wide range of snack parenting practices in young children.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorParentingParentsSnacksSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultChildChild, PreschoolChild RearingFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansInfantMaleMothers

Identifiers

PMID29475073
PMCPMC5878748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.