Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474940›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2018

Information Framing Reduces Initial Negative Attitudes in Cancer Patients' Decisions About Hospice Care.

Ilona Fridman, Paul A Glare, Stacy M Stabler, Andrew S Epstein, Alison Wiesenthal, Thomas W Leblanc, E Tory Higgins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pitfalls of reasoning in hospital-based transfusion medicine.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ilona FridmanFuqua, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: Ilona.fridman@duke.edu.
Paul A GlareDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Palliative Medicine Service, New York, New York, USA.
Stacy M StablerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Palliative Medicine Service, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew S EpsteinDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Palliative Medicine Service, New York, New York, USA.
Alison WiesenthalDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Palliative Medicine Service, New York, New York, USA.
Thomas W LeblancDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
E Tory HigginsDepartment of Psychology and Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDuke University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative attitudes toward hospice care might prevent patients with cancer from discussing and choosing hospice as they approach end of life. When making a decision, people often naturally focus on either expected benefits or the avoidance of harm. Behavioral research has demonstrated that framing information in an incongruent manner with patients' underlying motivational focus reduces their negative attitudes toward a disliked option.

objectiveOur study tests this communication technique with cancer patients, aiming to reduce negative attitudes toward a potentially beneficial but often-disliked option, that is, hospice care.

methodsPatients (n = 42) with active cancer of different types and/or stages completed a paper survey. Participants read a vignette about a patient with advanced cancer and a limited prognosis. In the vignette, the physician's advice to enroll in a hospice program was randomized, creating a congruent message or an incongruent message with patients' underlying motivational focus (e.g., a congruent message for someone most interested in benefits focuses on the benefits of hospice, whereas an incongruent message for this patient focuses on avoiding harm). Patients' attitudes toward hospice were measured before and after receiving the physician's advice.

resultsRegression analyses indicated that information framing significantly influenced patients with strong initial negative attitudes. Patients were more likely to reduce intensity of their initial negative attitude about hospice when receiving an incongruent message (b = -0.23; P < 0.01) than a congruent one (b = -0.13; P = 0.08).

conclusionThis finding suggests a new theory-driven approach to conversations with cancer patients who may harbor negative reactions toward hospice care.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDecision MakingAgedFemaleHealth CommunicationHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsRandom Allocationadviceattitude changecancerDecision makingend-of-life careinformation framingpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID29474940
PMCPMC8725201
OpenAlexW2788072921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.