ReviewGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2018
Preprocessing of 2-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis Images Applied to Proteomic Analysis: A Review.
Review in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Latest Advances in Omics Technology for Assessing Tissue Damage: Implications for the Study of Sudden Cardiac Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- [Rapid identification and analysis of hemoglobin isoelectric focusing electrophoresis images based on deep learning].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Article
- GelGenie: an AI-powered framework for gel electrophoresis image analysis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Protein Digestion for 2D-DIGE Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Summit: Automated Analysis of Arrayed Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis.SLAS technology · 2021Article
- Proteomic Advances in Cereal and Vegetable Crops.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-GE) image analysis based on CellProfiler: Pseudomonas aeruginosa AG1 as model.Medicine · 2020Article
- Joint pre-processing framework for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images based on nonlinear filtering, background correction and normalization techniques.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- 2D electrophoresis image brightness correction based on gradient interval histogram.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Combined Proteomics and Metabolism Analysis Unravels Prominent Roles of Antioxidant System in the Prevention of Alfalfa (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- HFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various methods and specialized software programs are available for processing two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DGE) images. However, due to the anomalies present in these images, a reliable, automated, and highly reproducible system for 2-DGE image analysis has still not been achieved. The most common anomalies found in 2-DGE images include vertical and horizontal streaking, fuzzy spots, and background noise, which greatly complicate computational analysis. In this paper, we review the preprocessing techniques applied to 2-DGE images for noise reduction, intensity normalization, and background correction. We also present a quantitative comparison of non-linear filtering techniques applied to synthetic gel images, through analyzing the performance of the filters under specific conditions. Synthetic proteins were modeled into a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution with adjustable parameters for changing the size, intensity, and degradation. Three types of noise were added to the images: Gaussian, Rayleigh, and exponential, with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) ranging 8-20 decibels (dB). We compared the performance of wavelet, contourlet, total variation (TV), and wavelet-total variation (WTTV) techniques using parameters SNR and spot efficiency. In terms of spot efficiency, contourlet and TV were more sensitive to noise than wavelet and WTTV. Wavelet worked the best for images with SNR ranging 10-20 dB, whereas WTTV performed better with high noise levels. Wavelet also presented the best performance with any level of Gaussian noise and low levels (20-14 dB) of Rayleigh and exponential noise in terms of SNR. Finally, the performance of the non-linear filtering techniques was evaluated using a real 2-DGE image with previously identified proteins marked. Wavelet achieved the best detection rate for the real image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.