Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474888›Full record

ReviewGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2018

Preprocessing of 2-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis Images Applied to Proteomic Analysis: A Review.

Manuel Mauricio Goez, Maria Constanza Torres-Madroñero, Sarah Röthlisberger, Edilson Delgado-Trejos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protein Digestion for 2D-DIGE Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteomic Advances in Cereal and Vegetable Crops.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel Mauricio GoezAutomatics, Electronics and Computer Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano, Medellin 050012, Colombia.
Maria Constanza Torres-MadroñeroAutomatics, Electronics and Computer Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano, Medellin 050012, Colombia. Electronic address: mariatorres@itm.edu.co.
Sarah RöthlisbergerBiomedical Innovation and Research Group, Faculty of Applied and Exact Sciences, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano, Medellin 050012, Colombia.
Edilson Delgado-TrejosQuality, Metrology and Production Research Group, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano, Medellin 050012, Colombia.
Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various methods and specialized software programs are available for processing two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DGE) images. However, due to the anomalies present in these images, a reliable, automated, and highly reproducible system for 2-DGE image analysis has still not been achieved. The most common anomalies found in 2-DGE images include vertical and horizontal streaking, fuzzy spots, and background noise, which greatly complicate computational analysis. In this paper, we review the preprocessing techniques applied to 2-DGE images for noise reduction, intensity normalization, and background correction. We also present a quantitative comparison of non-linear filtering techniques applied to synthetic gel images, through analyzing the performance of the filters under specific conditions. Synthetic proteins were modeled into a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution with adjustable parameters for changing the size, intensity, and degradation. Three types of noise were added to the images: Gaussian, Rayleigh, and exponential, with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) ranging 8-20 decibels (dB). We compared the performance of wavelet, contourlet, total variation (TV), and wavelet-total variation (WTTV) techniques using parameters SNR and spot efficiency. In terms of spot efficiency, contourlet and TV were more sensitive to noise than wavelet and WTTV. Wavelet worked the best for images with SNR ranging 10-20 dB, whereas WTTV performed better with high noise levels. Wavelet also presented the best performance with any level of Gaussian noise and low levels (20-14 dB) of Rayleigh and exponential noise in terms of SNR. Finally, the performance of the non-linear filtering techniques was evaluated using a real 2-DGE image with previously identified proteins marked. Wavelet achieved the best detection rate for the real image.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAnimalsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProteinsProteomicsProteins2D gel electrophoresisBackground correctionFilteringNoise reductionPreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID29474888
PMCPMC6000252
OpenAlexW2790566800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.