Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474649›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2018

Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm.

Andrea C Varella, Luther E Talbert, Buddhi B Achhami, Nancy K Blake, Megan L Hofland, Jamie D Sherman, Peggy F Lamb, Gadi V P Reddy, David K Weaver

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea C VarellaDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Luther E TalbertDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Buddhi B AchhamiDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Nancy K BlakeDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Megan L HoflandDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Jamie D ShermanDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Peggy F LambDepartment of Research Centers, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Gadi V P ReddyDepartment of Research Centers, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
David K WeaverDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Montana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.

Indexed as

AntibiosisFood ChainHerbivoryAnimalsHordeumHymenopteraLarvaMontanaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29474649
PMCPMC6019026
OpenAlexW2789757186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.