ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2015
Prediction of residual angina after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04475094 (Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of high-intensity statin on coronary microvascular dysfunction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Predictors of symptom improvement in patients with chronic coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Trial
- Variation in Health Status With Invasive vs Conservative Management of Chronic Coronary Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Trial
- Angina after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Pathophysiology, Chinese Medicine Management Strategies, and Future Directions.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention?Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Predicting Residual Angina After Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the OPEN-CTO Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Management of chronic ischemic heart disease into internal medicine and geriatric departments in Italy.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Thermodilution-Based Invasive Assessment of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow and Microvascular Resistance: Quantification of Microvascular (Dys)Function?Journal of interventional cardiology · 2020Review
- De-escalation of antianginal medications after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Frequency and relationship with health status.American heart journal · 2019Article
- Association of Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Matter and Ozone With Health Status and Mortality in Patients After Myocardial Infarction.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Observational
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Without Acute Myocardial Infarction in China: Results From the China PEACE Prospective Study of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JAMA network open · 2018Article
- Increased index of microcirculatory resistance in older patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2018Article
- Understanding How Patients Fare: Insights Into the Health Status Patterns of Patients With Coronary Disease and the Future of Evidence-Based Shared Medical Decision-Making.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2018Article
- The Impact of De-escalation of Antianginal Medications on Health Status After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Preinfarct Health Status and the Use of Early Invasive Versus Ischemia-Guided Management in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.The American journal of cardiology · 2017Article
- Predicting Adverse Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2016Article
- Debate. "Orbiting" around the management of stable angina. The clinician's perspective.REC, interventional cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAngina relief is a major goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, about one in five patients continue to have angina after PCI. Understanding patient factors associated with residual angina would enable providers to more accurately calibrate patients' expectations of angina relief after PCI, may support different follow-up strategies or approaches to coronary revascularization, and could potentially serve as a marker of PCI quality. METHODS AND
resultsAmong 2573 patients who had PCI at 10 US hospitals for stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 24% reported angina 6 months after PCI, as assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score (categorized as none vs. any angina; score = 100 vs. <100). Post-PCI angina was more common in those patients treated for unstable angina (30 vs. 20% stable angina and 21% NSTEMI, P < 0.001). Using a hierarchical logistic regression model, eight variables were independently associated with angina after PCI, including younger age, poor economic status, depression, and greater number of antianginal medications at the time of PCI (c-index = 0.75). The amount of angina at the time of PCI was more predictive of post-PCI angina in patients with stable or unstable angina when compared with NSTEMI (pinteraction = 0.01). The model demonstrated excellent calibration, both in the original sample (slope 1.04, intercept -0.01, r = 0.98) and in bootstrap validation.
conclusionBased on a large, multicentre cohort of PCI patients, we created a model of residual angina 6 months after PCI that can provide patients realistic expectations of angina relief, guide follow-up strategies, support the use of residual angina as a means of comparing PCI quality, and enable comparative effectiveness research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.