Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474557›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

PennDiff: detecting differential alternative splicing and transcription by RNA sequencing.

Yu Hu, Jennie Lin, Jian Hu, Gang Hu, Kui Wang, Hanrui Zhang, Muredach P Reilly, Mingyao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of alternative splicing in human cancer progression.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu HuDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics.
Jennie LinRenal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jian HuDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics.
Gang HuDepartment of Information Theory and Data Science, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Kui WangDepartment of Information Theory and Data Science, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hanrui ZhangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Muredach P ReillyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Mingyao LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics.

Funding

Training in Renal ResearchT32DK007006 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HOLZMAN, LAWRENCE B. · 1986 to 2023
$8.5M
Elucidation of Tissue-Specific Transcriptomic Profiles in Cardiometabolic DiseaseR01HL113147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2012 to 2022
$6.8M
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Human RetinaR01EY030192 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Cardiometabolic DiseaseK24HL107643 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2011 to 2020
$1.4M
Statistical Methods for Transcriptome Profiling Using RNA SequencingR01GM108600 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
Macrophage-specific function of GWAS CAD-associated LIPA alleles in atherosclerosisK99HL130574 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ZHANG, HANRUI · 2016 to 2017
$272k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030192NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL107643NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL130574NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113147NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007006NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Alternative splicing and alternative transcription are a major mechanism for generating transcriptome diversity. Differential alternative splicing and transcription (DAST), which describe different usage of transcript isoforms across different conditions, can complement differential expression in characterizing gene regulation. However, the analysis of DAST is challenging because only a small fraction of RNA-seq reads is informative for isoforms. Several methods have been developed to detect exon-based and gene-based DAST, but they suffer from power loss for genes with many isoforms. Results: We present PennDiff, a novel statistical method that makes use of information on gene structures and pre-estimated isoform relative abundances, to detect DAST from RNA-seq data. PennDiff has several advantages. First, grouping exons avoids multiple testing for 'exons' originated from the same isoform(s). Second, it utilizes all available reads in exon-inclusion level estimation, which is different from methods that only use junction reads. Third, collapsing isoforms sharing the same alternative exons reduces the impact of isoform expression estimation uncertainty. PennDiff is able to detect DAST at both exon and gene levels, thus offering more flexibility than existing methods. Simulations and analysis of a real RNA-seq dataset indicate that PennDiff has well-controlled type I error rate, and is more powerful than existing methods including DEXSeq, rMATS, Cuffdiff, IUTA and SplicingCompass. As the popularity of RNA-seq continues to grow, we expect PennDiff to be useful for diverse transcriptomics studies. Availability and implementation: PennDiff source code and user guide is freely available for download at https://github.com/tigerhu15/PennDiff. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingRNA IsoformsSoftwareTranscription, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansSequence Analysis, RNARNA Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID29474557
PMCPMC6041879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.