Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474490›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Reproducibility of estimated optimal peak output using a force-velocity test on a cycle ergometer.

Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva, Ricardo Rebelo-Gonçalves, Diogo Martinho, Alexis Ahmed, Leonardo G O Luz, João P Duarte, Vítor Severino, Rafael C Baptista, João Valente-Dos-Santos, Vasco Vaz and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Manuel J Coelho-E-SilvaResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-7331
Ricardo Rebelo-GonçalvesResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Diogo MartinhoResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Alexis AhmedFaculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Leonardo G O LuzResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
João P DuarteResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Vítor SeverinoResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rafael C BaptistaResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
João Valente-Dos-SantosResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Vasco VazFaculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rui S GonçalvesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Antonio TessitoreDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome, Italy.
António J FigueiredoResearch Unity for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/DTP/04213/2016), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to examine the reproducibility of estimated peak power and estimated pedal velocity in a multi-trial 10-s all-out cycling test among adult athletes (n = 22; aged 23.50±4.73 years). Stature, sitting height and body mass were measured. Leg length was estimated as stature minus sitting height. Body volume was obtained from air displacement plethysmography and was subsequently used to calculate body density. Fat mass and fat-free mass were derived. The short-term power outputs were assessed from the force-velocity test (FVT), using a friction-braked ergometer on two separated occasions. Differences between repeated measurements were examined with paired t-test and effect sizes calculated. No significant differences were found between session 1 (898 W, 142 rpm) and session 2 (906 W, 142 rpm). Test-retest procedure showed acceptable reliability for estimated peak power output [technical error of measurement (TEM) = 31.9 W; % coefficient of variation (CV) = 3.5; intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.986] and pedal velocity (TEM = 5.4 rpm, %CV = 3.8, ICC = 0.924). The current study demonstrated a reasonable reproducibility of estimated peak power and pedal velocity outputs in non-elite male athletes and supports that a familiarization session including a complete FVT protocol is not required.

Indexed as

Exercise TestAdultBody WeightFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29474490
PMCPMC5825072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.