Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474484›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Transgenerational effects of prenatal restricted diet on gene expression and histone modifications in the rat.

Joanna Nowacka-Woszuk, Izabela Szczerbal, Anna M Malinowska, Agata Chmurzynska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nutrition and its role in epigenetic inheritance of obesity and diabetes across generations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2020
    Review
  9. Nutrigenomics in livestock-recent advances.Journal of applied genetics · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna Nowacka-WoszukDepartment of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wolynska 33, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-3576
Izabela SzczerbalDepartment of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wolynska 33, Poznan, Poland.
Anna M MalinowskaInstitute of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, Poznan, Poland.
Agata ChmurzynskaInstitute of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, Poznan, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary triggers acting on a developing fetus can affect the functioning of the body in later life; this can be observed on various levels, including epigenetic modifications and gene expression. Early-life programmed changes may be transmitted to successive generations. In this study, the impact of prenatal restricted diet was studied in four generations of rats. We hypothesized that this diet can induce changes in the expression of major genes involved in two epigenetic mechanisms: DNA methylation and histone modifications. The transcript level of six genes involved in these processes (Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, Mecp2, Hdac1, and Sin3a) was therefore determined in three tissues (liver, adipose, and muscle). This diet was found to have no effect on the F0 pregnant females. In the F1 progeny (fetuses at day 19 of pregnancy and 4-week-old rats) significant differences in the expression of the genes were observed mostly in the liver; in subsequent generations, we therefore studied only this tissue. Among the genes encoding DNA methyltransferases, significant changes were observed for Dnmt1 in the F1 animals from the restricted group, but these were no longer evident in F2 and F3. The Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b genes showed no differences in mRNA level in F1 fetuses. Concerning the transcript level of the Mecp2 gene only in F1 generation significant changes were found. For the histone modification genes, an increase in the expression of Hdac1 in fetus liver was found in F1 and F2, while its level decreased in F3. The abundance of the Sin3a transcript varied in all generations. It was also found that the mRNA levels of the studied genes correlated highly positive with each other, but only in fetuses from the F1 restricted group. The DNA methylation cell potential, defined as the ratio of SAM (S-adenosylmethionine) to SAH (S-adenosylhomocysteine), was measured in the liver, with no alterations being found in the restricted groups. Evaluation of global histone H3 acetylation showed that it underwent a significant increase in the fetal livers of F1, while during aging (four-week old animals) this difference was no longer maintained. A tendency of increased H3 acetylation in fetuses was also detected in F2 generation. In F1 fetuses from restricted group the increased H3 acetylation positively correlated with transcriptional status of the studied genes. Our results indicate that the prenatal restriction diet can affect the activity of genes involved in epigenetic mechanisms in the liver across generations. Moreover, this feeding type influenced the global histone H3 acetylation in fetal liver.

Indexed as

DietAcetylationAnimalsFemaleFetal DevelopmentHistonesLiverPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRatsRNA, MessengerHistonesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID29474484
PMCPMC5825138
OpenAlexW2792429614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.