Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474470›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Antibiotic use, knowledge and health literacy among the general population in Berlin, Germany and its surrounding rural areas.

Florian Salm, Clemens Ernsting, Adelheid Kuhlmey, Melanie Kanzler, Petra Gastmeier, Paul Gellert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Health Literacy in Ethiopia: Evidence Synthesis and Implications.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Florian SalmInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2605-8927
Clemens ErnstingInstitute of Medical Sociology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Adelheid KuhlmeyInstitute of Medical Sociology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Melanie KanzlerGerman Protestant Hospital Association, DEKV, Berlin, Germany.
Petra GastmeierInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Paul GellertInstitute of Medical Sociology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Medical Association · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesKnowledge concerning antibiotic use in the general population is insufficient. The way health literacy is related to antibiotic use aside from knowledge needs further investigation. Our aim was to compare the levels of knowledge of antibiotics and health literacy in individuals who had taken antibiotics in recent years compared with those who not had taken antibiotics.

methodsA population-based cross-sectional survey of 2,000 individuals aged 35 and older from Berlin, Germany and its surrounding rural and suburban areas (response rate 59%) with strata urban/rural, sex, age, and education. Computer-assisted personal interviews were conducted by external, trained interviewers during home visits. Knowledge, health literacy, and antibiotic use were assessed using standardized questionnaires.

resultsIn all, 33.3% (666/2,000) of the participants indicated having had an antimicrobial therapy during the previous 12 months. Adjusting for sex, age, educational level and health literacy, individuals with four correct answers regarding antibiotics were 1.70 times and those with three correct answers 1.94 more likely to have had a history of recent antibiotic use than those who did not have any correct answers. Individuals with sufficient health literacy were 0.57 times less likely to have had a recent history of antibiotic use than individuals with insufficient health literacy.

conclusionPatients who have used antibiotics might have more knowledge as a result of their recent involvement with the topic of antibiotic use; health literacy may be a preventive mechanism to use antibiotics more critically. Besides improving the health knowledge of the general population and of vulnerable groups such as patients with low levels of health literacy, intervention strategies should focus on providers as well.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBerlinCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRural PopulationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29474470
PMCPMC5825110
OpenAlexW2793231859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.