Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474422›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

PuLSE: Quality control and quantification of peptide sequences explored by phage display libraries.

Steven Shave, Stefan Mann, Joanna Koszela, Alastair Kerr, Manfred Auer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven ShaveSchool of Biological Sciences and Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Stefan MannSchool of Biological Sciences and Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Joanna KoszelaSchool of Biological Sciences and Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Alastair KerrSchool of Biological Sciences and Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Manfred AuerSchool of Biological Sciences and Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-3522

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of highly diverse phage display libraries is based on assumption that DNA bases are incorporated at similar rates within the randomized sequence. As library complexity increases and expected copy numbers of unique sequences decrease, the exploration of library space becomes sparser and the presence of truly random sequences becomes critical. We present the program PuLSE (Phage Library Sequence Evaluation) as a tool for assessing randomness and therefore diversity of phage display libraries. PuLSE runs on a collection of sequence reads in the fastq file format and generates tables profiling the library in terms of unique DNA sequence counts and positions, translated peptide sequences, and normalized 'expected' occurrences from base to residue codon frequencies. The output allows at-a-glance quantitative quality control of a phage library in terms of sequence coverage both at the DNA base and translated protein residue level, which has been missing from toolsets and literature. The open source program PuLSE is available in two formats, a C++ source code package for compilation and integration into existing bioinformatics pipelines and precompiled binaries for ease of use.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPeptide LibrarySoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyEscherichia coliOligonucleotidesOligonucleotidesPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID29474422
PMCPMC5825087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.