Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474417›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evaluation of the impact of reducing national emissions of SO2 and metals in Poland on background pollution using a bioindication method.

Wojciech Dmuchowski, Dariusz Gozdowski, Aneta H Baczewska-Dąbrowska, Piotr Dąbrowski, Barbara Gworek, Irena Suwara

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wojciech DmuchowskiWarsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0092-365X
Dariusz GozdowskiWarsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska, Warsaw, Poland.
Aneta H Baczewska-DąbrowskaPolish Academy of Sciences Botanical Garden-Center for Conservation of Biological Diversity, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr DąbrowskiWarsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska, Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara GworekWarsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska, Warsaw, Poland.
Irena SuwaraWarsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in environmental pollution by S, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in 2006-2014 were evaluated using a bioindication method. This method was based on measurements of pollutants in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. The measurements were performed in the Chojnowskie Forests, a region recognized as a background area for central Poland. The changes in the contents of sulfur (S) and metals in needles were not comparable with the changes in the global emissions of the pollutants in Poland. On average, the pollution level in the study area decreased by 9.9% for S, 61.4% for Pb, 22.5% for Cd, 11.7% for Zn and 10.4% for Cu. During the same period, global emissions in Poland decreased by 38.1% for S, 8.0% for Pb, 63.2% for Cd, 11.7% for Zn and 14.0% for Cu. Therefore, the differences in the changes in emissions and the needle contents of each element should be examined separately which was not a goal of this study. However, the discrepancy between these results did not prevent the use of bioindication methods. Evaluation of pollutant contents in plants reflected their incorporation in biological processes rather than air or soil pollution levels.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmentEnvironmental BiomarkersEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionHumansMetals, HeavyPinus sylvestrisPlant LeavesPolandSoil PollutantsSulfur DioxideAir PollutantsEnvironmental BiomarkersMetals, HeavySoil PollutantsSulfur Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID29474417
PMCPMC5825029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.