ArticlePloS one2018
Primate social attention: Species differences and effects of individual experience in humans, great apes, and macaques.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The neuroscience of social feelings: mechanisms of adaptive social functioning.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Causal Dynamics of Social Gaze in Primate Prefrontal-Amygdala Networks Revealed by Dynamic Bayesian Modeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Partial face visibility and facial cognition: event-related potential and eye tracking investigation.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2025Article
- The perception of prosocial agents by chimpanzees and humans.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- After all, how valuable is the dog model for examining human socio-cognitive abilities?Biologia futura · 2025Review
- Article
- Predator gaze captures both human and chimpanzee attention.PloS one · 2024Article
- Social attention during object engagement: toward a cross-species measure of preferential social orienting.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Article
- Widespread implementations of interactive social gaze neurons in the primate prefrontal-amygdala networks.Neuron · 2022Article
- The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.Behavior research methods · 2021Review
- Sharing Experiences in Infancy: From Primary Intersubjectivity to Shared Intentionality.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Human and monkey infant attention to dynamic social and nonsocial stimuli.Developmental psychobiology · 2020Article
- Differences in the mutual eye gaze of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) · 2020Article
- The role of early social rearing, neurological, and genetic factors on individual differences in mutual eye gaze among captive chimpanzees.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A review of research in primate sanctuaries.Biology letters · 2020Review
- Observing animals and humans: dogs target their gaze to the biological information in natural scenes.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Viewing heterospecific facial expressions: an eye-tracking study of human and monkey viewers.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Visual preferences for direct-gaze faces in infant macaques (Macaca mulatta) with limited face exposure.Developmental psychobiology · 2019Article
- Non-invasive Eye Tracking Methods for New World and Old World Monkeys.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When viewing social scenes, humans and nonhuman primates focus on particular features, such as the models' eyes, mouth, and action targets. Previous studies reported that such viewing patterns vary significantly across individuals in humans, and also across closely-related primate species. However, the nature of these individual and species differences remains unclear, particularly among nonhuman primates. In large samples of human and nonhuman primates, we examined species differences and the effects of experience on patterns of gaze toward social movies. Experiment 1 examined the species differences across rhesus macaques, nonhuman apes (bonobos, chimpanzees, and orangutans), and humans while they viewed movies of various animals' species-typical behaviors. We found that each species had distinct viewing patterns of the models' faces, eyes, mouths, and action targets. Experiment 2 tested the effect of individuals' experience on chimpanzee and human viewing patterns. We presented movies depicting natural behaviors of chimpanzees to three groups of chimpanzees (individuals from a zoo, a sanctuary, and a research institute) differing in their early social and physical experiences. We also presented the same movies to human adults and children differing in their expertise with chimpanzees (experts vs. novices) or movie-viewing generally (adults vs. preschoolers). Individuals varied within each species in their patterns of gaze toward models' faces, eyes, mouths, and action targets depending on their unique individual experiences. We thus found that the viewing patterns for social stimuli are both individual- and species-specific in these closely-related primates. Such individual/species-specificities are likely related to both individual experience and species-typical temperament, suggesting that primate individuals acquire their unique attentional biases through both ontogeny and evolution. Such unique attentional biases may help them learn efficiently about their particular social environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.