Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474410›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Factor structure and measurement invariance across various demographic groups and over time for the PHQ-9 in primary care patients in Spain.

César González-Blanch, Leonardo Adrián Medrano, Roger Muñoz-Navarro, Paloma Ruíz-Rodríguez, Juan Antonio Moriana, Joaquín T Limonero, Florian Schmitz, Antonio Cano-Vindel, PsicAP Research Group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

César González-BlanchMental Health Centre, University Hospital "Marqués de Valdecilla"- IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3181-4731
Leonardo Adrián MedranoFaculty of Psychology, University Siglo 21, Córdoba, Argentina.
Roger Muñoz-NavarroDepartment of Basic Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Paloma Ruíz-RodríguezCastilla La Nueva Primary Care Centre, Health Service of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Antonio MorianaDepartment of Psychology, University of Córdoba/ Maimónides Institute for Research in Biomedicine of Cordoba-IMIBIC/Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Joaquín T LimoneroDepartment of Basic Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Florian SchmitzDepartment of Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Antonio Cano-VindelDepartment of Basic Psychology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
PsicAP Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely-used screening tool for depression in primary care settings. The purpose of the present study is to identify the factor structure of the PHQ-9 and to examine the measurement invariance of this instrument across different sociodemographic groups and over time in a sample of primary care patients in Spain. Data came from 836 primary care patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (PsicAP study) and a subsample of 218 patients who participated in a follow-up assessment at 3 months. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test one- and two-factor structures identified in previous studies. Analyses of multiple-group invariance were conducted to determine the extent to which the factor structure is comparable across various demographic groups (i.e., gender, age, marital status, level of education, and employment situation) and over time. Both one-factor and two-factor re-specified models met all the pre-established fit criteria. However, because the factors identified in the two-factor model were highly correlated (r = .86), the one-factor model was preferred for its parsimony. Multi-group CFA indicated measurement invariance across different demographic groups and across time. The present findings suggest that physicians in Spain can use the PHQ-9 to obtain a global score for depression severity in different demographic groups and to reliably monitor changes over time in the primary care setting.

Indexed as

Patient Health QuestionnairePrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultDepressionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsSpainTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29474410
PMCPMC5825085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.