ArticleCritical care medicine2018
Using Default Options and Other Nudges to Improve Critical Care.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Documenting Prognosis on the Information Provided to ICU Proxies: A Randomized Trial.Critical care medicine · 2019Trial
- Article
- Gamification in Critical Care Education and Practice.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Article
- User-Centered Design to Reduce Inappropriate Blood Transfusion Orders.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- The Contribution of Cognitive Factors to Compulsive Buying Behaviour: Insights from Shopping Habit Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Primary palliative care recommendations for critical care clinicians.Journal of intensive care · 2022Review
- Clinical deployment environments: Five pillars of translational machine learning for health.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Review
- The Society of Critical Care Medicine at 50 Years: ICU Organization and Management.Critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the Intensive Care Unit Trial Protocol.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021Article
- Individualized Care Is Superior to Standardized Care for the Majority of Critically Ill Patients.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- What every intensivist must know about antimicrobial stewardship: its pitfalls and its challenges.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva · 2020Article
- Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction Model for Targeted Palliative Care Among Hospitalized Medical Patients: a Pilot Quasi-experimental Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA: past, present, and future.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2019Review
- Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Toward Understanding the Use of Gastrostomy in Critically Ill Adults.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019Article
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Utilization of Prone Positioning for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Critical care medicine · 2019Article
- Surrogate Perspectives on Patient Preference Predictors: Good Idea, but I Should Decide How They Are Used.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.