Trial reportFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
Changes in the Vaginal Microenvironment as Related to Frequency of Pessary Removal.
Trial report in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics reduce the recurrence of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in Chinese women.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Vaginal microflora following the use of a disposable home-use vaginal device and a commercially available ring pessary for pelvic organ prolapse management: a randomized controlled trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Trial
- Vaginal Microbiota and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Personalized Management of Hydroxyquinoline Hypersensitivity in Pessary Care: A Case-Based Approach to Tailored Treatment.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Updates in Pessary Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 3 Committee 1 - Pessary Management.International urogynecology journal · 2025Review
- What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Adapting to Challenging Circumstances: Pessary Care in a Racially Diverse Urban Population Within a U.S. Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2022Article
- Bacterial biofilm formation on vaginal ring pessaries used for pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2022Observational
- Cross sectional study on assessment of ring pessary cleaning and removal every six months: adverse events and complications.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Managing female pelvic floor disorders: a medical device review and appraisal.Interface focus · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to describe the effect of frequency of pessary removal on the vaginal microenvironment.
methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of hydroxyquinoline gel in women presenting for pessary fitting. Patients had vaginal secretions analyzed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months. Patients were stratified by frequency of pessary removal at least once daily, at least once weekly, and less often than once weekly. These groups were compared for prevalence of Lactobacillus predominance (primary outcome), anaerobic predominance, Mobiluncus prominence, vaginal symptoms, and bacterial vaginosis by Nugent criteria, and correction for confounding variables was performed.
resultsOne hundred thirty-seven women were included in this analysis: 34 (25%) removed the pessary daily, 54 (39%) at least weekly, and 49 (36%) less often than once weekly. Women who removed the pessary less often than weekly were older (P < 0.01), using more hormone therapy (P = 0.03), and more likely to have bacterial vaginosis at baseline (P < 0.01). At 2 weeks, the predominance of Lactobacillus in the group removing pessary daily was higher (41% daily vs 24% weekly vs 9% longer, P = 0.03) and this persisted after confounder correction (P < 0.01). Women who removed their pessary less than weekly were more likely to have anaerobic predominance at 3 months (P = 0.04).
conclusionsWomen who remove their pessaries less often than once weekly have an increased prevalence of anaerobes at 3 months, but no difference in vaginal symptoms or pessary satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.