ArticleACS nano2018
Probing DNA Translocations with Inplane Current Signals in a Graphene Nanoribbon with a Nanopore.
Article in ACS nano, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polarization-Driven DNA Nucleobases Recognition on Germanium Sulfide Nanoribbon.Applied surface science · 2026Article
- Interrogating nanopores with light: optipore sensing for single molecule analyses.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Detecting DNA translocation through a nanopore using a van der Waals heterojunction diode.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Detecting DNA Translocation through a Nanopore using a van der Waals Heterojunction Diode.Research square · 2025Article
- Graphene Nanopore Fabrication and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Road Toward Nanopore Sequencing of Glycosaminoglycans.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025Review
- Advances in field-effect biosensors towards point-of-use.Nanotechnology · 2023Review
- Voltage controlled shutter regulates channel size and motion direction of protein aperture as durable nano-electric rectifier-----An opinion in biomimetic nanoaperture.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Drilling accurate nanopores for biosensors by energetic multi-wall carbon nanotubes: a molecular dynamics investigation.Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Article
- Controllable Shrinking Fabrication of Solid-State Nanopores.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Detecting Individual Proteins and Their Surface Charge Variations in Solution by the Potentiometric Nanoimpact Method.ACS sensors · 2022Article
- Thermoelectric properties of doped graphene nanoribbons: density functional theory calculations and electrical transport.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Nanopore sensors for viral particle quantification: current progress and future prospects.Bioengineered · 2021Review
- Novel electrical properties and applications in kaleidoscopic graphene nanoribbons.RSC advances · 2021Review
- Graphene Nanoribbons: Prospects of Application in Biomedicine and Toxicity.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Understanding Electrical Conduction and Nanopore Formation During Controlled Breakdown.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021Article
- Prospects of Observing Ionic Coulomb Blockade in Artificial Ion Confinements.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Advances in Label-Free Detections for Nanofluidic Analytical Devices.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Arrayed nanopore silver thin films for surface-enhanced Raman scattering.RSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many theoretical studies predict that DNA sequencing should be feasible by monitoring the transverse current through a graphene nanoribbon while a DNA molecule translocates through a nanopore in that ribbon. Such a readout would benefit from the special transport properties of graphene, provide ultimate spatial resolution because of the single-atom layer thickness of graphene, and facilitate high-bandwidth measurements. Previous experimental attempts to measure such transverse inplane signals were however dominated by a trivial capacitive response. Here, we explore the feasibility of the approach using a custom-made differential current amplifier that discriminates between the capacitive current signal and the resistive response in the graphene. We fabricate well-defined short and narrow (30 nm × 30 nm) nanoribbons with a 5 nm nanopore in graphene with a high-temperature scanning transmission electron microscope to retain the crystallinity and sensitivity of the graphene. We show that, indeed, resistive modulations can be observed in the graphene current due to DNA translocation through the nanopore, thus demonstrating that DNA sensing with inplane currents in graphene nanostructures is possible. The approach is however exceedingly challenging due to low yields in device fabrication connected to the complex multistep device layout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.