Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29473984›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2018

Dorsal hippocampus is necessary for visual categorization in rats.

Jangjin Kim, Leyre Castro, Edward A Wasserman, John H Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early development of navigationally relevant location information in the retrosplenial complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Object Feature Memory Is Distorted by Category Structure.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Hippocampus Maps Concept Space, Not Feature Space.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Selective attention in rat visual category learning.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jangjin KimDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Leyre CastroDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Edward A WassermanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
John H FreemanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-9182

Funding

ONTOGENESIS OF CATEGORIZATION: LINKING DEVELOPMENT, MECHANISMS, AND BIOLOGYP01HD080679 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE, BRADLEY C · 2016 to 2020
$5.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD080679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampus may play a role in categorization because of the need to differentiate stimulus categories (pattern separation) and to recognize category membership of stimuli from partial information (pattern completion). We hypothesized that the hippocampus would be more crucial for categorization of low-density (few relevant features) stimuli-due to the higher demand on pattern separation and pattern completion-than for categorization of high-density (many relevant features) stimuli. Using a touchscreen apparatus, rats were trained to categorize multiple abstract stimuli into two different categories. Each stimulus was a pentagonal configuration of five visual features; some of the visual features were relevant for defining the category whereas others were irrelevant. Two groups of rats were trained with either a high (dense, n = 8) or low (sparse, n = 8) number of category-relevant features. Upon reaching criterion discrimination (≥75% correct, on 2 consecutive days), bilateral cannulas were implanted in the dorsal hippocampus. The rats were then given either vehicle or muscimol infusions into the hippocampus just prior to various testing sessions. They were tested with: the previously trained stimuli (trained), novel stimuli involving new irrelevant features (novel), stimuli involving relocated features (relocation), and a single relevant feature (singleton). In training, the dense group reached criterion faster than the sparse group, indicating that the sparse task was more difficult than the dense task. In testing, accuracy of both groups was equally high for trained and novel stimuli. However, both groups showed impaired accuracy in the relocation and singleton conditions, with a greater deficit in the sparse group. The testing data indicate that rats encode both the relevant features and the spatial locations of the features. Hippocampal inactivation impaired visual categorization regardless of the density of the category-relevant features for the trained, novel, relocation, and singleton stimuli. Hippocampus-mediated pattern completion and pattern separation mechanisms may be necessary for visual categorization involving overlapping irrelevant features.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiscrimination LearningHippocampusMalePattern Recognition, VisualRatsRats, Long-Evanscategorizationdiscriminationgeneralizationlearningreversible inactivationtouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID29473984
PMCPMC5992064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.