ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018
Developing and testing a brief clinic-based lung cancer screening decision aid for primary care settings.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05824273 (Leveraging Social Media to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness, Knowledge and Uptake in High-Risk Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Leveraging Social Media to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness, Knowledge and Uptake in High-Risk Populations
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Feasibility and acceptability of an everyday patient-centered discussion model for primary care: An exploratory, single-center study in the VA primary care setting.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Development, Co-Design and Pilot Testing of Resources to Support Informed Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening in Australia: A Study Engaging Diverse Communities and Expert Healthcare Professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Article
- MyLungHealth, a Patient-Facing Education Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Qualitative User-Centered Design Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on a Patient-Facing Tool for Lung Cancer Screening.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.Family practice · 2024Article
- LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening-a Randomized Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Review
- Motivation, acceptability and attitudes toward lung cancer screening among persons who attend a tobacco cessation program: A multicenter survey in Italy.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Men's Perception of Being Invited for Prostate Cancer Testing and the Information About Its Pros and Cons-A Survey from Two Population-based Testing Programmes.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Development and testing of "Is Lung Cancer Screening for You?" A computer-based decision aid.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Interventions Designed to Increase the Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: An Equity-Oriented Scoping Review.JTO clinical and research reports · 2023Article
- Primary Care Physician Perceptions of Shared Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Perceived effectiveness of cancer screening among family medicine and internal medicine physicians in the United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Pilot Study of an Encounter Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Article
- Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- "To know or not to know…?" Push and pull in ever smokers lung screening uptake decision-making intentions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Developing and testing a brief clinic-based lung cancer screening decision aid for primary care settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer screening-related decisions require patients to evaluate complex medical information in short time frames, often with primary care providers (PCPs) they do not know. PCPs play an essential role in facilitating comprehensive shared decision making (SDM).
objectiveTo develop and test a decision aid (DA) and SDM strategy for PCPs and high-risk patients.
designThe DA was tested with 20 dyads. Each dyad consisted of one PCP and one patient eligible for screening. A prospective, one-group, mixed-method study design measured fidelity, patient values, screening intention, acceptability and satisfaction.
resultsFour PCPs and 20 patients were recruited from an urban academic medical centre. Most patients were female (n = 14, 70%), most had completed high school (n = 15, 75%), and their average age was 65 years old. Half were African American. Patients and PCPs rated the DA as helpful, easy to read and use and acceptable in terms of time frame (observed t = 11.6 minutes, SD 2.7). Most patients (n = 16, 80%) indicated their intent to be screened. PCPs recommended screening for most patients (n = 17, 85%).
conclusionsEvidence supports the value of lung cancer screening with LDCT for select high-risk patients. Guidelines endorse engaging patients and their PCPs in SDM discussions. Our findings suggest that using a brief, interactive, plain-language, culturally sensitive, theory-based DA and SDM strategy is feasible, acceptable and may be essential to effectively translate and sustain the adoption of LDCT screening recommendations into the clinic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.