Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29473230›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2018

Engineering Extracellular Vesicles with the Tools of Enzyme Prodrug Therapy.

Gregor Fuhrmann, Rona Chandrawati, Paresh A Parmar, Timothy J Keane, Stephanie A Maynard, Sergio Bertazzo, Molly M Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Extracellular vesicle-matrix interactions.Nature reviews. Materials · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gregor FuhrmannDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-5126
Rona ChandrawatiDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-8844
Paresh A ParmarDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Timothy J KeaneDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-0538
Stephanie A MaynardDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Sergio BertazzoDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-8190
Molly M StevensDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-266X

Funding

European Research Council 616417Medical Research Council MR/K026682/1Medical Research Council MR/L012677/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have recently gained significant attention as important mediators of intercellular communication, potential drug carriers, and disease biomarkers. These natural cell-derived nanoparticles are postulated to be biocompatible, stable under physiological conditions, and to show reduced immunogenicity as compared to other synthetic nanoparticles. Although initial clinical trials are ongoing, the use of EVs for therapeutic applications may be limited due to undesired off-target activity and potential "dilution effects" upon systemic administration which may affect their ability to reach their target tissues. To fully exploit their therapeutic potential, EVs are embedded into implantable biomaterials designed to achieve local delivery of therapeutics taking advantage of enzyme prodrug therapy (EPT). In this first application of EVs for an EPT approach, EVs are used as smart carriers for stabilizing enzymes in a hydrogel for local controlled conversion of benign prodrugs to active antiinflammatory compounds. It is shown that the natural EVs' antiinflammatory potential is comparable or superior to synthetic carriers, in particular upon repeated long-term incubations and in different macrophage models of inflammation. Moreover, density-dependent color scanning electron microscopy imaging of EVs in a hydrogel is presented herein, an impactful tool for further understanding EVs in biological settings.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesCell CommunicationDrug CarriersNanoparticlesProdrugsDrug CarriersProdrugsenzyme prodrug therapyexosomeshydrogelsmicrovesiclesβ-glucuronidase

Identifiers

PMID29473230
PMCPMC5901706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.