Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29473163›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2019

Binocular response modulation in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Kacie Dougherty, Michael C Schmid, Alexander Maier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Binocular Circuitry as a Model for Understanding Experience-Dependent Circuit Development across the Mammalian Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of RGC degeneration in the pathogenesis of glaucoma.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Retinorecipient areas in the common marmoset (Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kacie DoughertyDepartment of Psychology, Center for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-0026
Michael C SchmidInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1424-130X
Alexander MaierDepartment of Psychology, Center for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-502X
Vanderbilt University · USNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Training in Vision ResearchT32EY007135 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEOFFREY F WOODMAN · 1994 to 2026
$5.8M
Binocular integration in the primate lateral geniculate nucleusR01EY027402 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MAIER, ALEXANDER VINZENZ · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027402NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus (LGN) receives the main outputs of both eyes and relays those signals to the visual cortex. Each retina projects to separate layers of the LGN so that each LGN neuron is innervated by a single eye. In line with this anatomical separation, visual responses of almost all of LGN neurons are driven by one eye only. Nonetheless, many LGN neurons are sensitive to what is shown to the other eye as their visual responses differ when both eyes are stimulated compared to when the driving eye is stimulated in isolation. This, predominantly suppressive, binocular modulation of LGN responses might suggest that the LGN is the first location in the primary visual pathway where the outputs from the two eyes interact. Indeed, the LGN features several anatomical structures that would allow for LGN neurons responding to one eye to modulate neurons that respond to the other eye. However, it is also possible that binocular response modulation in the LGN arises indirectly as the LGN also receives input from binocular visual structures. Here we review the extant literature on the effects of binocular stimulation on LGN spiking responses, highlighting findings from cats and primates, and evaluate the neural circuits that might mediate binocular response modulation in the LGN.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsGeniculate BodiesHumansPhotic StimulationRetinaVision, BinocularVisual CortexVisual FieldsVisual Pathwaysbinocular combinationbinocular integrationbinocular visionlateral geniculate nucleusneurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID29473163
PMCPMC6107447
OpenAlexW2790353315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.