Reply to: "All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
   Review
2. New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
   Article
3. Comparison of different automatic methods for the delineation of the total metabolic tumor volume in I-II stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2020
   Article
4. Positron emission tomography PET/CT harmonisation study of different clinical PET/CT scanners using commercially available software.BJR open · 2020
   Article
5. Reply to the Letter to the Editor from Peters et al: On the use of the liver as a reference organ for Deauville scoring in lymphoma patients and how it may be affected by liver steatosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting.2018

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as