ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018
Chlorophyll Fluorescence Video Imaging: A Versatile Tool for Identifying Factors Related to Photosynthesis.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytoremediation of Meta-Cresol by Sunflower: Tolerance of Plant and Removal of M-Cresol.Toxics · 2025Article
- Chlorophylls and Polyphenols: Non-Enzymatic Regulation of the Production and Removal of Reactive Oxygen Species, as a Way of Regulating Abiotic Stress in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cyclic electron flow compensates loss of PGDH3 and concomitant stromal NADH reduction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Structure, function, and assembly of PSI in thylakoid membranes of vascular plants.The Plant cell · 2024Review
- Rational design of ROS scavenging and fluorescent gold nanoparticles to deliver siRNA to improve plant resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Early-Stage Detection of Biotic and Abiotic Stress on Plants by Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Chlorophyll fluorometry in evaluating photosynthetic performance: key limitations, possibilities, perspectives and alternatives.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Review
- Comparative Phenotyping of Two Commonly UsedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Visualizing the Integrity of Chloroplast Envelope by Rhodamine and Nile Red Staining.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Imaging of ChlorophyllFrontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Methodology of Drought Stress Research: Experimental Setup and Physiological Characterization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence provide an elegant and non-invasive means of probing the dynamics of photosynthesis. Advances in video imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence have now made it possible to study photosynthesis at all levels from individual cells to entire crop populations. Since the technology delivers quantitative data, is easily scaled up and can be readily combined with other approaches, it has become a powerful phenotyping tool for the identification of factors relevant to photosynthesis. Here, we review genetic chlorophyll fluorescence-based screens of libraries of Arabidopsis and Chlamydomonas mutants, discuss its application to high-throughput phenotyping in quantitative genetics and highlight potential future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.