Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472748›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Diclofenac Sustained release Versus Transdermal Diclofenac Patch in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized, Open Label Trial.

Viraj Ashok Shinde, Mrunalini Kalikar, Satyajeet Jagtap, Ganesh N Dakhale, Mangesh Bankar, Chaitali S Bajait, Vijay M Motghare, Ashlesha A Pashilkar, Latesh B Raghute, Ajita D Khamkar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viraj Ashok ShindeDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Mrunalini KalikarDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Satyajeet JagtapDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Ganesh N DakhaleDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Mangesh BankarDepartment of Pharmacology, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar, India.
Chaitali S BajaitDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Vijay M MotghareDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Ashlesha A PashilkarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Latesh B RaghuteDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Ajita D KhamkarDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Government Medical College · INICAR - Central Island Agricultural Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of transdermal patches of diclofenac sodium with oral diclofenac sustained release (SR) in patients of chronic musculoskeletal MSK pain conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe eligible patients were given either transdermal diclofenac patch or tablet diclofenac SR. Pain was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks using a visual analog scale. Adverse events were recorded. Patients with 18-65 years old of either gender with score of ≥4 on a 11-item numeric rating scale-numeric version of visual analog scale for pain with diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hand of at least 3 months duration, with independent radiological confirmation of OA or having pain associated with other MSK conditions such as soft-tissue rheumatism, cervical and lumbar back pain, and fibromyalgia, of at least 3 months duration were included in this study.

resultsTransdermal diclofenac diethylamine patch and tablet diclofenac sodium sustained release (SR) do not significantly differ in the reduction of numerical rating scores at the end of 4 weeks (P = 0.8393).

conclusionTransdermal diclofenac was equi-efficacious as tablet diclofenac sodium SR in reducing pain due to chronic MSK pain conditions.

Indexed as

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsnumerical rating scoretopical

Identifiers

PMID29472748
PMCPMC5820746
OpenAlexW2791013481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.