Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472694›Full record

ArticleHeredity2018

Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials.

Kaio Olímpio Das Graças Dias, Salvador Alejandro Gezan, Claudia Teixeira Guimarães, Alireza Nazarian, Luciano da Costa E Silva, Sidney Netto Parentoni, Paulo Evaristo de Oliveira Guimarães, Carina de Oliveira Anoni, José Maria Villela Pádua, Marcos de Oliveira Pinto and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. GIS-FA: an approach to integrating thematic maps, factor-analytic, and envirotyping for cultivar targeting.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kaio Olímpio Das Graças DiasDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Salvador Alejandro GezanSchool of Forest Resources & Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Claudia Teixeira GuimarãesEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
Alireza NazarianSchool of Forest Resources & Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Luciano da Costa E SilvaJMP Division, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Sidney Netto ParentoniEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
Paulo Evaristo de Oliveira GuimarãesEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
Carina de Oliveira AnoniDepartamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
José Maria Villela PáduaDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Marcos de Oliveira PintoEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
Roberto Willians NodaEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
Carlos Alexandre Gomes RibeiroDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Jurandir Vieira de MagalhãesEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
Antonio Augusto Franco GarciaDepartamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
João Cândido de SouzaDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Lauro José Moreira GuimarãesEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil. lauro.guimaraes@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-2481
Maria Marta PastinaEmbrapa Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil. marta.pastina@embrapa.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding for drought tolerance is a challenging task that requires costly, extensive, and precise phenotyping. Genomic selection (GS) can be used to maximize selection efficiency and the genetic gains in maize (Zea mays L.) breeding programs for drought tolerance. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) using additive (A) and additive + dominance (AD) models to predict the performance of untested maize single-cross hybrids for drought tolerance in multi-environment trials. Phenotypic data of five drought tolerance traits were measured in 308 hybrids along eight trials under water-stressed (WS) and well-watered (WW) conditions over two years and two locations in Brazil. Hybrids' genotypes were inferred based on their parents' genotypes (inbred lines) using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers obtained via genotyping-by-sequencing. GS analyses were performed using genomic best linear unbiased prediction by fitting a factor analytic (FA) multiplicative mixed model. Two cross-validation (CV) schemes were tested: CV1 and CV2. The FA framework allowed for investigating the stability of additive and dominance effects across environments, as well as the additive-by-environment and the dominance-by-environment interactions, with interesting applications for parental and hybrid selection. Results showed differences in the predictive accuracy between A and AD models, using both CV1 and CV2, for the five traits in both water conditions. For grain yield (GY) under WS and using CV1, the AD model doubled the predictive accuracy in comparison to the A model. Through CV2, GS models benefit from borrowing information of correlated trials, resulting in an increase of 40% and 9% in the predictive accuracy of GY under WS for A and AD models, respectively. These results highlight the importance of multi-environment trial analyses using GS models that incorporate additive and dominance effects for genomic predictions of GY under drought in maize single-cross hybrids.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalDroughtsGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableAlgorithmsEnvironmentGene-Environment InteractionGenetic MarkersGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsSelection, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID29472694
PMCPMC5997769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.