Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472688›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2018

Regenerative endodontic therapy for managing immature non-vital teeth: a national survey of UK paediatric dental specialists and trainees.

H Nazzal, H Tong, P Nixon, M Duggal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) for managing immature non-vital teeth: experiences and opinions of paediatric dental practitioners in the European and Arabian regions.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021
    Article
  6. Revitalisation endodontic treatment of traumatised immature teeth: a prospective long-term clinical study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H NazzalUniversity of Leeds, Paediatric Dentistry, Clarendon Way, Leeds, WF1 4JN.
H TongFaculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, 11 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119083.
P NixonLeeds Dental Institute, Restorative, LDI, Clarendon Way, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9LU.
M DuggalDiscipline of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University Health System, Singapour, 119083, Singapore.
Leeds Dental Hospital · GBNational University Health System · SGNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Several guidelines have been published advocating the use of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) in managing non-vital immature permanent teeth. It is unclear, however, how many UK paediatric dental specialists routinely use this technique and their opinion of its outcomes, and barriers to its use.Aim To assess the knowledge, experience and the opinion of UK based paediatric dental specialists/trainees (UKPDS/T) and practitioners working in the capacity of paediatric dental specialists on the use of RET.Design A cross-sectional study using a 22-item questionnaire was developed using the Bristol Online Survey tool and circulated electronically to members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry between August and November 2016.Results Ninety-eight UKPDS/T completed the survey. A quarter of respondents (N = 24, 24.5%) reported using RET. Reasons cited for not using RET included lack of: training (N = 48, 45%), materials (N = 28, 26%), evidence (N = 17, 16%) and suitable cases (N = 6, 6%). Different protocols in terms of disinfection, medicaments, scaffolds, and obturation material were identified.Conclusions This survey highlights a low uptake of RET by current UKPDS and trainees with several barriers identified. Deviations from the current RET guidelines were identified. Recommendations addressing the use of RET in light of the findings of this survey were made.

Indexed as

ChildCross-Sectional StudiesDentistsHumansPractice Patterns, Dentists'Regenerative EndodonticsSurveys and QuestionnairesTooth, NonvitalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29472688
OpenAlexW2792896550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.