ArticleAnnals of transplantation2018
Association of Graft Effluent Parameters with Donor Body Mass Index, Graft Quality, and Post-Transplant Events.
Article in Annals of transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated whether effluent parameters prior to reperfusion correlate with post-transplant outcomes in liver transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Concentrations of high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), uncleaved cytokeratin-18 (M65), caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 fragment (M30), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were measured in effluent samples from 53 adult liver recipients (42 survived for 1 year and 11 did not survive). RESULTS Effluent concentrations of ALP (p=0.006), AST (p=0.050), and Ca++ (p=0.003) were higher in patients with bacteriemia in the first post-transplant year and ALP (p=0.015) was higher in patients with early graft dysfunction (EAD). Multivariate analysis of effluent parameters showed that Ca++ >0.30 mmol/l (p=0.012, odds ratio [OR]=7.12, confidence interval [CI]=1.56-32.58), and ALP ≥27 IU/l (p=0.033, OR=5.31, CI=1.14-27.74) were significantly associated with 1-year post-transplant bacteriemia, whereas ALP ≥27 IU/l (p=0.020, OR=5.56, CI=1.32-23.46) was significantly associated with EAD. HMGB1 >54 pg/ml (p=0.008, OR=6.05, CI=1.59-23.00) was significantly associated with the donor body mass index (p=0.008, OR=6.05, CI=1.59-23.00) and fatty liver (p=0.005, OR=11.68, CI=2.10-64.01). CONCLUSIONS Effluent parameters are indicators of liver quality and predict the outcome of liver transplantation. High effluent Ca++ and ALP are risk factors of post-transplant bacteriemia. In addition, high ALP is a risk factor of EAD, and high HMGB1 is an indicator of liver quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29472523PMC6248291W2787997369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.