Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472518›Full record

ArticleCancer research2018

Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Reveals Potential Roles of NEK9 and MAP2K4 in Resistance to PI3K Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.

Filip Mundt, Sandeep Rajput, Shunqiang Li, Kelly V Ruggles, Arshag D Mooradian, Philipp Mertins, Michael A Gillette, Karsten Krug, Zhanfang Guo, Jeremy Hoog and 22 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteomic approaches for interrogating kinase signaling networks.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The NIMA-related kinase family and cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Filip MundtThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sandeep RajputDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Shunqiang LiDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Kelly V RugglesDepartment of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Arshag D MooradianDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Philipp MertinsThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michael A GilletteThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Karsten KrugThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Zhanfang GuoDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jeremy HoogDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Petra Erdmann-GilmoreDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Tina PrimeauDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Shixia HuangDan L. Duncan Cancer Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Dean P EdwardsDan L. Duncan Cancer Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Xiaowei WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Xuya WangInstitute for Systems Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Emily KawalerInstitute for Systems Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
D R ManiThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Karl R ClauserThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Feng GaoDivision of Public Health Science, Siteman Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jingqin LuoDivision of Public Health Science, Siteman Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sherri R DaviesDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Gary L JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kuan-Lin HuangDepartment of Medicine, McDonnell Genome Institute, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Christopher J YoonDepartment of Medicine, McDonnell Genome Institute, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Li DingDepartment of Medicine, McDonnell Genome Institute, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
David FenyöInstitute for Systems Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Matthew J EllisLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Medicine and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
R Reid TownsendDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jason M HeldDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Steven A CarrThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts. scarr@broad.mit.edu cynthiaxma@wustl.edu.
Cynthia X MaDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. scarr@broad.mit.edu cynthiaxma@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · USBroad Institute · USBaylor College of Medicine · USJames S. McDonnell Foundation · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DAVID R ROWLEY · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Proteo-genomic Discovery, Prioritization and Verification of Cancer BiomarkersU24CA160034 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARR, STEVEN A, PAULOVICH, AMANDA G · 2011 to 2016
$16.2M
Illuminating Function of the Understudied Druggable KinomeU24DK116204 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JOHNSON, GARY L. · 2017 to 2022
$13.6M
Cancer Proteome Center at Washington Univ, Univ of North Carolina & Boise StateU24CA160035 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, XIAN, ELLIS, MATTHEW J · 2011 to 2016
$11.8M
MICROSCALED PROTEOGENOMICS FOR CANCER CLINICAL TRIALSU01CA214125 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ANURAG, MEENAKSHI, CARR, STEVEN A · 2017 to 2021
$7.0M
Center of Excellence for High Throughput Proteogenomic CharacterizationU24CA210986 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARR, STEVEN A, GILLETTE, MICHAEL A · 2016 to 2020
$6.4M
Proteogenomic Data Analysis for Cancer Systems Biology and Clinical TranslationU24CA210972 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DING, LI, FENYO, DAVID · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214125NCI NIH HHS U24 CA160034NCI NIH HHS U24 CA160035NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210972NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210986NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK116204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of PI3K signaling is frequently observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), yet PI3K inhibitors have shown limited clinical activity. To investigate intrinsic and adaptive mechanisms of resistance, we analyzed a panel of patient-derived xenograft models of TNBC with varying responsiveness to buparlisib, a pan-PI3K inhibitor. In a subset of patient-derived xenografts, resistance was associated with incomplete inhibition of PI3K signaling and upregulated MAPK/MEK signaling in response to buparlisib. Outlier phosphoproteome and kinome analyses identified novel candidates functionally important to buparlisib resistance, including NEK9 and MAP2K4. Knockdown of NEK9 or MAP2K4 reduced both baseline and feedback MAPK/MEK signaling and showed synthetic lethality with buparlisib

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHumansMAP Kinase Kinase 4Mass SpectrometryMiceMorpholinesNIMA-Related KinasesProteomicsRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingSignal TransductionAminopyridinesAntineoplastic AgentsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesMAP2K4 protein, humanMAP Kinase Kinase 4MorpholinesNEK9 protein, humanNIMA-Related KinasesNVP-BKM120PIK3CA protein, humanRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID29472518
PMCPMC5955814
OpenAlexW2789273393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.