Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472310›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2018

Temozolomide Plus Bevacizumab in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Poor Performance Status: An ANOCEF Phase II Trial (ATAG).

Germán Reyes-Botero, Stéphanie Cartalat-Carel, Olivier L Chinot, Maryline Barrie, Luc Taillandier, Patrick Beauchesne, Isabelle Catry-Thomas, Jérôme Barrière, Jean-Sebastien Guillamo, Michel Fabbro and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Therapeutic Options in Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Germán Reyes-BoteroService de Neurologie 2 Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France germanreyes77@hotmail.com.
Stéphanie Cartalat-CarelDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France.
Olivier L ChinotAix-Marseille Université AP-HMCHU Timone Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Marseille, France.
Maryline BarrieAix-Marseille Université AP-HMCHU Timone Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Marseille, France.
Luc TaillandierCHU Nancy, Nancy, France.
Patrick BeauchesneCHU Nancy, Nancy, France.
Isabelle Catry-ThomasHôpital Saint André CHU, Bordeaux, France.
Jérôme BarrièreCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Jean-Sebastien GuillamoCHU Caen, Caen, France.
Michel FabbroInstitut Regional de Cancer Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Didier FrappazCentre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Alexandra Benouaich-AmielCHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
Emilie Le RhunCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Chantal CampelloCHU Nimes, Nimes, France.
Isabelle TennevetCentre Henri Becquerel CLCC, Rouen, France.
François GhiringhelliGeorges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France.
Marie-Laure TanguyAPHP CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Karima MokhtariAPHP CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Jérôme HonnoratDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France.
Jean-Yves DelattreService de Neurologie 2 Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedResults suggest that the combination of bevacizumab plus temozolomide is active in terms of response rate, survival, performance, quality of life, and cognition in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme with poor performance status.Whether this combination is superior to temozolomide alone remains to be demonstrated by a randomized study.

backgroundThe optimal treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in patients aged ≥70 years with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <70 is not established. This clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of upfront temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (Bev) in patients aged ≥70 years and a KPS <70. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients aged ≥70 years with a KPS <70 and biopsy-proven GBM were eligible for this multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, phase II trial of older patients with impaired performance status. Treatment consisted of TMZ administered at 130-150 mg/m

resultsThe trial included 66 patients (median age of 76 years; median KPS of 60). The median overall survival (OS) was 23.9 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 19-27.6), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.3 weeks (95% CI, 12.9-19.3). Twenty-two (33%) patients became transiently capable of self-care (i.e., KPS >70). Cognition and quality of life significantly improved over time during treatment. Grade ≥3 hematological adverse events occurred in 13 (20%) patients, high blood pressure in 16 (24%), venous thromboembolism in 3 (4.5%), cerebral hemorrhage in 2 (3%), and intestinal perforation in 2 (3%).

conclusionThis study suggests that TMZ + Bev treatment is active in elderly patients with GBM with low KPS and has an acceptable tolerance level.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBevacizumabFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleTemozolomideBevacizumabTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID29472310
PMCPMC5947454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.