Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472268›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Neuroimaging of headaches in patients with normal neurological examination: protocol for a systematic review.

Bernold Kenteu, Yannick F Fogang, Ulrich Flore Nyaga, Joseline G Zafack, Jean Jacques Noubiap, Joseph Kamtchum-Tatuene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernold KenteuService de Radiologie et Imagerie Médicale, Département de Biologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Faculté de Médecine, de Pharmacie et d'Ontostomatologie, Université de Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Yannick F FogangHead Neuropsychiatry Department, Bafoussam Regional Hospital, Bafoussam, Cameroon.
Ulrich Flore NyagaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Joseline G ZafackDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
Jean Jacques NoubiapDepartment of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Joseph Kamtchum-TatueneBrain Infections Group, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-4202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeadache disorders (HD) are among the most frequent neurological disorders seen in neurology practice. Because secondary HD are rare, patients' examination is most often unremarkable. However, the will to relieve patients' anxiety and the fear of prosecutions lead to overuse of neuroimaging thus resulting in the discovery of incidental findings (IF) or normal variants that can lead to futile or harmful procedures. Knowing the probability of identifying a potentially clinically significant lesion in patients with isolated headache could facilitate decision-making and reduce health costs. This review aims to determine the prevalence of incidental findings and normal anatomic variants (NAV) on neuroimaging studies performed in patients presenting with headache and normal neurological examination. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Studies reporting neuroimaging findings in patients with headache and normal neurological examination and published before the 30 September 2017 will be identified by searching PubMed, Medline and EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). Relevant unpublished papers and conference proceedings will also be checked. Full texts of eligible studies will then be accessed and data extracted using a standard data extraction sheet. Studies will be assessed for quality and risk of bias. Heterogeneity of studies will be evaluated by the χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The current study is based on published data; ethical approval is, therefore, not required. The final report of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Furthermore, findings will be presented at conferences and submitted to relevant health authorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017079714.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingHeadache DisordersHumansIncidental FindingsNeurologic ExaminationPublication BiasResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topicgeneral medicine (see internal medicine)neurology

Identifiers

PMID29472268
PMCPMC5855383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.