Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472259›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Feasibility of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the acute setting: the LaCeS feasibility trial protocol.

Deena Harji, Helen Marshall, Katie Gordon, Hannah Crow, Victoria Hiley, Dermot Burke, Ben Griffiths, Catherine Moriarty, Maureen Twiddy, John L O'Dwyer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early post-operative outcomes in adults undergoing minimally invasive versus open emergency colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  2. Ethical Considerations and Equipoise in Cancer Surgery.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deena HarjiNewcastle Centre for Bowel Disease, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Helen MarshallClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Katie GordonClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hannah CrowClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Victoria HileyClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Dermot BurkeJohn Goligher Colorectal Department, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Ben GriffithsNewcastle Centre for Bowel Disease, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Catherine MoriartyJohn Goligher Colorectal Department, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Maureen TwiddyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
John L O'DwyerAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Azmina VerjeePatient and Public Representative, Association of Coloprocotology of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK.
Julia BrownClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Peter SagarJohn Goligher Colorectal Department, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBAssociation of Clinical Pathologists · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0614-34091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute colorectal surgery forms a significant proportion of emergency admissions within the National Health Service. There is limited evidence to suggest minimally invasive surgery may be associated with improved clinical outcomes in this cohort of patients. Consequently, there is a need to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in the acute colorectal setting. However,emergency colorectal surgical trials have previously been difficult to conduct due to issues surrounding recruitment and equipoise. The LaCeS (randomised controlled trial of Laparoscopic versus open Colorectal Surgery in the acute setting) feasibility trial will determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive, phase III trial of laparoscopic versus open acute colorectal resection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The LaCeS feasibility trial is a prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, parallel group, pragmatic randomised controlled feasibility trial. Patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive eitherlaparoscopic or open surgery. The trial aims to recruit at least 66 patients from five acute general surgical units across the UK. Patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of acute colorectal pathology requiring resection on clinical and radiological/endoscopic investigations, with a National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death classification of urgent will be considered eligible for participation. The primary outcome is recruitment. Secondary outcomes include assessing the safety profile of laparoscopic surgery using intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, conversion rates and patient-safety indicators as surrogate markers. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes will also be reported. The trial will contain an embedded qualitative study to assess clinician and patient acceptability of trial processes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The LaCeS feasibility trial is approved by the Yorkshire and The Humber, Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 15/ YH/0542). The results from the trial will be presented at national and international colorectal conferences and will be submitted for publication to peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15681041; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesHumansLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeResearch DesignSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdomadult surgeryclinical trialscolorectal surgery

Identifiers

PMID29472259
PMCPMC5879497
OpenAlexW2791850637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.