Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29472177›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Implementation of the Enhanced Moderated Online Social Therapy (MOST+) Model Within a National Youth E-Mental Health Service (eheadspace): Protocol for a Single Group Pilot Study for Help-Seeking Young People.

Simon Rice, John Gleeson, Steven Leicester, Sarah Bendall, Simon D'Alfonso, Tamsyn Gilbertson, Eoin Killackey, Alexandra Parker, Reeva Lederman, Greg Wadley and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A new hope for early psychosis care: the evolving landscape of digital care tools.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2019
    Article
  9. Digital tools for youth mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Simon RiceOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-8553
John GleesonSchool of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-492X
Steven Leicesterheadspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-7014
Sarah BendallOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-6190
Simon D'AlfonsoOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-8730
Tamsyn GilbertsonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-8002
Eoin KillackeyOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-5551
Alexandra ParkerOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-6306
Reeva LedermanSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-329X
Greg WadleySchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4230-3440
Olga Santesteban-EcharriOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2677-6125
Ingrid PryorOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-8610
Daveena MawrenOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-7526
Aswin RatheeshOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-9422
Mario Alvarez-JimenezOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-9086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a substantial need for youth electronic mental health (e-mental health) services. In addressing this need, our team has developed a novel moderated online social therapy intervention called enhanced moderated online social therapy (MOST+). MOST+ integrates real-time, clinician-delivered Web chat counseling, interactive user-directed online therapy, expert and peer moderation, and private and secure peer-to-peer social networking. MOST+ has been designed to give young people immediate, 24-hour access to anonymous, evidence-based, and short-term mental health care.

objectiveThe primary aims of this pilot study were to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of the intervention. Secondary aims were to assess prepost changes in key psychosocial outcomes and collect qualitative data for future intervention refinement.

methodsMOST+ will be embedded within eheadspace, an Australian youth e-mental health service, and will be evaluated via an uncontrolled single-group study. Approximately 250 help-seeking young people (16-25 years) will be progressively recruited to the intervention from the eheadspace home page over the first 4 weeks of an 8-week intervention period. All participants will have access to evidence-based therapeutic content and integrated Web chat counseling. Additional access to moderated peer-to-peer social networking will be granted to individuals for whom it is deemed safe and appropriate, through a three-tiered screening process. Participants will be enrolled in the MOST+ intervention for 1 week, with the option to renew their enrollment across the duration of the pilot. Participants will complete a survey at enrollment to assess psychological well-being and other mental health outcomes. Additional assessment will occur following account deactivation (ie, after participant has opted not to renew their enrollment, or at trial conclusion) and will include an online survey and telephone interview assessing psychological well-being and experience of using MOST+.

resultsRecruitment for the study commenced in October 2017. We expect to have initial results in March 2018, with more detailed qualitative and quantitative analyses to follow.

conclusionsThis is the first Australia-wide research trial to pilot an online social media platform merging real-time clinical support, expert and peer moderation, interactive online therapy, and peer-to-peer social networking. The importance of the project stems from the need to develop innovative new models for the efficient delivery of responsive evidence-based online support to help-seeking young people. If successful, this research stands to complement and enhance e-mental health services in Australia.

Indexed as

adolescentinternetmental heathsocial networkingyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID29472177
PMCPMC5843792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.