Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471865›Full record

Trial reportParasites & vectors2018

A multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing a nifurtimox-eflornithine combination to standard eflornithine monotherapy for late stage Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in Uganda.

Freddie Kansiime, Seraphine Adibaku, Charles Wamboga, Franklin Idi, Charles Drago Kato, Lawrence Yamuah, Michel Vaillant, Deborah Kioy, Piero Olliaro, Enock Matovu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemotherapy for second-stage human African trypanosomiasis: drugs in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of the Anti-Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Nano-Medicines a Hope for Chagas Disease!Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Freddie KansiimeBusitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Box 1460, Mbale, Uganda.
Seraphine AdibakuMoyo District Health Office, P.O. Box 1, Moyo, Uganda.
Charles WambogaMinistry of Health, Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Franklin IdiMoyo Hospital, P.O. Box 1, Moyo, Uganda.
Charles Drago KatoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources & Bio-security, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Lawrence YamuahArmauer Hansen Research Institute, Box 1005, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Michel VaillantCompetence Centre in Methodology and Statistics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1ab Rue Edison, Strassen, L-1445, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Deborah KioyGeneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 150, route de Ferney, 1211, Geneva 2, Switzerland.
Piero OlliaroUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Enock MatovuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources & Bio-security, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. matovue@covab.mak.ac.ug.
Makerere University · UGArmauer Hansen Research Institute · ETBusitema University · UGFoundation for laboratory medicine · CHKiwoko Hospital · UGLuxembourg Institute of Health · LUMinistry of Health · UGWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the combination of nifurtimox and eflornithine (NECT) is currently recommended for the treatment of the late stage human African trypansomiasis (HAT), single-agent eflornithine was still the treatment of choice when this trial commenced. This study intended to provide supportive evidence to complement previous trials.

methodsA multi-centre randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial was carried out in the Trypanosoma brucei gambiense endemic districts of North-Western Uganda to compare the efficacy and safety of NECT (200 mg/kg eflornithine infusions every 12 h for 7 days and 8 hourly oral nifurtimox at 5 mg/kg for 10 days) to the standard eflornithine regimen (6 hourly at 100 mg/kg for 14 days). The primary endpoint was the cure rate, determined as the proportion of patients alive and without laboratory signs of infection at 18 months post-treatment, with no demonstrated trypanosomes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood or lymph node aspirates, and CSF white blood cell count < 20 /μl. The non-inferiority margin was set at 10%.

resultsOne hundred and nine patients were enrolled; all contributed to the intent-to-treat (ITT), modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and safety populations, while 105 constituted the per-protocol population (PP). The cure rate was 90.9% for NECT and 88.9% for eflornithine in the ITT and mITT populations; the same was 90.6 and 88.5%, respectively in the PP population. Non-inferiority was demonstrated for NECT in all populations: differences in cure rates were 0.02 (95% CI: -0.07-0.11) and 0.02 (95% CI: -0.08-0.12) respectively. Two patients died while on treatment (1 in each arm), and 3 more during follow-up in the NECT arm. No difference was found between the two arms for the secondary efficacy and safety parameters. A meta-analysis involving several studies demonstrated non-inferiority of NECT to eflornithine monotherapy.

conclusionsThese results confirm findings of earlier trials and support implementation of NECT as first-line treatment for late stage T. b. gambiense HAT. The overall risk difference for cure between NECT and eflornithine between this and two previous randomised controlled trials is 0.03 (95% CI: -0.02-0.08). The NECT regimen is simpler, safer, shorter and less expensive than single-agent DFMO.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN03148609 (registered 18 April 2008).

Indexed as

Trypanosoma brucei gambienseAdolescentAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationEflornithineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNifurtimoxSafetyTreatment OutcomeTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosomiasis, AfricanUgandaYoung AdultEflornithineNifurtimoxTrypanocidal AgentsHuman African trypanosomiasis (HAT)Meningo-encephalitic stageNifurtimox-eflornithine combination treatment (NECT)Second-stage HAT

Identifiers

PMID29471865
PMCPMC5824494
OpenAlexW2805610213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.