Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471861›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FITNET-NHS (Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the NHS) compared to Activity Management to treat paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sarah Baos, Amberly Brigden, Emma Anderson, William Hollingworth, Simon Price, Nicola Mills, Lucy Beasant, Daisy Gaunt, Kirsty Garfield, Chris Metcalfe and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah BaosCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield, Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Amberly BrigdenCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield, Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Emma AndersonCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield, Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. emma.anderson@bristol.ac.uk.
William HollingworthBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Simon PriceComputer Science, University of Bristol, Merchant Venturers Building, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.
Nicola MillsBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Lucy BeasantCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield, Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Daisy GauntBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Kirsty GarfieldBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Chris MetcalfeBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Roxanne ParslowCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield, Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Harriet DowningBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
David KesslerBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
John MacleodBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Paul StallardDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AD, UK.
Hans KnoopDepartment for Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC) University of Amsterdam, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elise Van de PutteDepartment of Paediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sanne NijhofDepartment of Paediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gijs BleijenbergRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Esther CrawleyCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield, Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
University of Bristol · GBWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2017-10-169Department of Health HTA/14/192/109Department of Health SRF-2013-06-013Medical Research Council G0800800Medical Research Council MR/L004933/1Medical Research Council MR/L004933/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a relatively common and disabling condition. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) as a treatment option for paediatric CFS/ME because there is good evidence that it is effective. Despite this, most young people in the UK are unable to access local specialist CBT for CFS/ME. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed FITNET was effective in the Netherlands but we do not know if it is effective in the National Health Service (NHS) or if it is cost-effective. This trial will investigate whether FITNET-NHS is clinically effective and cost-effective in the NHS.

methodsSeven hundred and thirty-four paediatric patients (aged 11-17 years) with CFS/ ME will be randomised (1:1) to receive either FITNET-NHS (online CBT) or Activity Management (delivered via video call). The internal pilot study will use integrated qualitative methods to examine the feasibility of recruitment and the acceptability of treatment. The full trial will assess whether FITNET-NHS is clinically effective and cost-effective. The primary outcome is disability at 6 months, measured using the SF-36-PFS (Physical Function Scale) questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness is measured via cost-utility analysis from an NHS perspective. Secondary subgroup analysis will investigate the effectiveness of FITNET-NHS in those with co-morbid mood disorders. DISCUSSION: If FITNET-NHS is found to be feasible and acceptable (internal pilot) and effective and cost-effective (full trial), its provision by the NHS has the potential to deliver substantial health gains for the large number of young people suffering from CFS/ME but unable to access treatment because there is no local specialist service. This trial will provide further evidence evaluating the delivery of online CBT to young people with chronic conditions.

trial registrationISRCTN registry, registration number: ISRCTN18020851 . Registered on 4 August 2016.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInternetState MedicineAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAffectAge FactorsChildChild BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisDisability EvaluationFatigue Syndrome, ChronicFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsActivity managementCBTCFS/MEChronic fatigue syndromeE-counsellingE-healthE-therapyMyalgic encephalomyelitisOnline systemsPaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID29471861
PMCPMC5824604
OpenAlexW2797962280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.