Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471846›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2018

Understanding nurses' dual practice: a scoping review of what we know and what we still need to ask on nurses holding multiple jobs.

Giuliano Russo, Inês Fronteira, Tiago Silva Jesus, James Buchan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Levels of Burnout and Risk Factors in Medical Area Nurses: A Meta-Analytic Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Burnout and fatigue and the employment of nurses in several workplaces: a cross-sectional study.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Frontiers in health services · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Migration Intent of Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kosovo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Developing the health workforce for universal health coverage.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuliano RussoCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, United Kingdom. g.russo@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-369X
Inês FronteiraGHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Nova University of Lisbon, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tiago Silva JesusGHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Nova University of Lisbon, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon, Portugal.
James BuchanGHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Nova University of Lisbon, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMounting evidence suggests that holding multiple concurrent jobs in public and private (dual practice) is common among health workers in low- as well as high-income countries. Nurses are world's largest health professional workforce and a critical resource for achieving Universal Health Coverage. Nonetheless, little is known about nurses' engagement with dual practice.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature on nurses' dual practice with the objective of generating hypotheses on its nature and consequences, and define a research agenda on the phenomenon. The Arksey and O'Malley's methodological steps were followed to develop the research questions, identify relevant studies, include/exclude studies, extract the data, and report the findings. PRISMA guidelines were additionally used to conduct the review and report on results.

resultsOf the initial 194 records identified, a total of 35 met the inclusion criteria for nurses' dual practice; the vast majority (65%) were peer-reviewed publications, followed by nursing magazine publications (19%), reports, and doctoral dissertations. Twenty publications focused on high-income countries, 16 on low- or middle-income ones, and two had a multi country perspective. Although holding multiple jobs not always amounted to dual practice, several ways were found for public-sector nurses to engage concomitantly in public and private employments, in regulated as well as in informal, casual fashions. Some of these forms were reported as particularly prevalent, from over 50% in Australia, Canada, and the UK, to 28% in South Africa. The opportunity to increase a meagre salary, but also a dissatisfaction with the main job and the flexibility offered by multiple job-holding arrangements, were among the reported reasons for engaging in these practices. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsLimited and mostly circumstantial evidence exists on nurses' dual practice, with the few existing studies suggesting that the phenomenon is likely to be very common and carry  implications for health systems and nurses' welfare worldwide. We offer an agenda for future research to consolidate the existing evidence and to further explore nurses' motivation; without a better understanding of nurse dual practice, this will continue to be a largely 'hidden' element in nursing workforce policy and practice, with an unclear impact on the delivery of care.

Indexed as

EmploymentMotivationNursesPrivate SectorPublic SectorAustraliaCanadaDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesHumansSalaries and Fringe BenefitsUnited KingdomCasualization of workHuman resources for healthMoonlightingMultiple job-holdingNursesNurses dual practicePrivate health sector

Identifiers

PMID29471846
PMCPMC5824568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.