Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471838›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Impact assessment of Iran's health technology assessment programme.

Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Farideh Mohtasham, Ashraf Velayati

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Healthcare priority-setting criteria and social values in Iran: an investigation of local evidence.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bahareh YazdizadehKnowledge Utilization Research Centre (KURC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farideh MohtashamKnowledge Utilization Research Centre (KURC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. f-mohtasham@farabi.tums.ac.ir.
Ashraf VelayatiShaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 24435-102-03-92
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing approximately 10 years from the beginning of Iran's national Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, the present study aims to evaluate its success by examining the impact of HTA and identifying the determinant factors leading to the implementation of HTA report results.

methodsThe triangulation method was employed herein. HTA reports were initially identified and their impact and determinant factors were then examined from the perspectives of both researchers (by preparing a questionnaire according to the Payback model and sending it to HTA principle investigators) and stakeholders (semi-structured interviews held with each HTA stakeholder). Simultaneously, the quality of the HTA reports was examined with relevant critical appraisal checklists.

resultsThe impact of 19 equipment technologies and four pharmaceutical technologies were assessed in this study. Twenty researchers replied (response rate, 86.96%) to the questionnaire on the impact of HTA reports from the researcher's perspective. To assess the impact of HTA reports from the stakeholder's perspective, seven policy-makers were chosen and interviewed as the main target audience. The most common step taken to disseminate the results of the HTA projects was publication. Conducting the HTA had taught researchers and their colleagues' new skills and had facilitated the securing of research grants from other organisations. Most reports had used the systematic review method but the relevant details had been scarcely presented regarding outcomes, costs and analysis. The greatest impact of HTA reports on decision-making had been on policy-makers providing and allocating finances. Barriers in stewardship, identification and prioritisation of topics, performance and dissemination of HTA results were the main barriers of implementing HTAs.

conclusionsIn most aspects, the status of HTA impact reports need improvement. Thus far, the barriers and facilitators of the HTA programme in Iran have been investigated in other studies. These findings should be pooled to reach a solution that can be actively applied to the health system to improve the status quo of HTA in Iran.

Indexed as

Health Impact AssessmentNational Health ProgramsProgram EvaluationAdministrative PersonnelChecklistCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareEquipment and SuppliesHealth PolicyHumansIranPharmaceutical PreparationsResearch PersonnelResearch ReportStakeholder ParticipationPharmaceutical PreparationsHealth research impact assessmentHealth technology assessmentResearch payback

Identifiers

PMID29471838
PMCPMC5824575
OpenAlexW2800258189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.