ArticleBMC pediatrics2018
Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emicizumab and shared medical decision in patients living with hemophilia A.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2026Article
- Decision-Making at the Limit of Viability in Newborns: Insights from a Survey of Medical Professionals.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethical challenges and moral conflicts in periviability prenatal counseling: a scoping review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Ethical and management dilemmas in the care of the newborn at the limit of viability: a narrative review.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Review
- Development of a checklist for evaluation of shared decision-making in consultation for extremely preterm delivery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Short-term outcomes of treatment limitation discussions in neonatal care units of tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations regarding the treatment of extremely preterm infants at the limit of viability: a comprehensive review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- Public Attitudes Toward Ethics and Practices in End-of-Life Decision-Making for Neonates.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Parental factors affecting their participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions: A qualitative study Parents' participation in decision-making.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Management of the smaller twin with impending compromise in twin pregnancies complicated by selective fetal growth restriction: a questionnaire-based study of clinical practice patterns.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Uncertainty and probability in neonatal end-of-life decision-making: analysing real-time conversations between healthcare professionals and families of critically ill newborns.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Moral distress among neonatologists working in neonatal intensive care units in Greece: a qualitative study.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
- Attitudes About Extremely Preterm Birth Among Obstetric and Neonatal Health Care Professionals in England: A Qualitative Study.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- The COVID-related mental health load of neonatal healthcare professionals: a multicenter study in Italy.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2022Observational
- The Meaning Given to Bioethics as a Source of Support by Physicians Who Care for Children Who Require Long-Term Ventilation.Qualitative health research · 2022Article
- Experience of care of hospitalized newborns and young children and their parents: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Exploring implicit bias in the perceived consequences of prematurity amongst health care providers in North Queensland - a constructivist grounded theory study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- National Divergences in Perinatal Palliative Care Guidelines and Training in Tertiary NICUs.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants.
methodsAll 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored.
resultsNinety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given.
conclusionsPhysicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.