Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471355›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Closing the loop with an enhanced referral management system.

Harley Ramelson, Amanda Nederlof, Sam Karmiy, Pamela Neri, David Kiernan, Rajlakshmi Krishnamurthy, Adrienne Allen, David W Bates

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harley RamelsonInformation Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, USA.
Amanda NederlofInformation Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, USA.
Sam KarmiyInformation Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, USA.
Pamela NeriInformation Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, USA.
David KiernanInformation Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, USA.
Rajlakshmi KrishnamurthyNewton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
Adrienne AllenNorthShore Physicians Group, Danvers, MA, USA.
David W BatesInformation Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a referral manager tool on primary care practices. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a referral manager module in a locally developed electronic health record (EHR) that was enhanced to improve the referral management process in primary care practices. Baseline (n = 61) and follow-up (n = 35) provider and staff surveys focused on the ease of performing various steps in the referral process, confidence in completing those steps, and user satisfaction. Additional metrics were calculated that focused on completed specialist visits, acknowledged notes, and patient communication. Results: Of 1341 referrals that were initiated during the course of the study, 76.8% were completed. All the steps of the referral process were easier to accomplish following implementation of the enhanced referral manager module in the EHR. Specifically, tracking the status of an in-network referral became much easier (+1.43 [3.91-2.48] on a 5-point scale, P < .0001). Although we found improvement in the ease of performing out-of-network referrals, there was a greater impact on in-network referrals. Discussion: Implementation of an electronic tool developed using user-centered design principles along with adequate staff to monitor and intervene when necessary made it easier for primary care practices to track referrals and to identify if a breakdown in the process occurred. This is especially important for high-priority referrals. Out-of-network referrals continue to present challenges, which may eventually be helped by improving interoperability among EHRs and scheduling systems. Conclusion: An enhanced referral manager system can improve referral workflows, leading to enhanced efficiency and patient safety and reduced malpractice risk.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedAttitude of Health PersonnelData DisplayHumansPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID29471355
PMCPMC7647022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.