Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471021›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2018

Does male preference play a role in maintaining female limited polymorphism in a Batesian mimetic butterfly?

E L Westerman, R Letchinger, A Tenger-Trolander, D Massardo, D Palmer, M R Kronforst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behaviour before beauty: signal weighting during mate selection in the butterflyEthology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E L WestermanDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, 850 W. Dickson St., Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Electronic address: ewesterm@uark.edu.
R LetchingerDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: riva.letchinger@gmail.com.
A Tenger-TrolanderDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: atengertrolander@uchicago.edu.
D MassardoDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: darlimassardo@gmail.com.
D PalmerDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: dhpalmer@uchicago.edu.
M R KronforstDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: mkronforst@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Characterizing the Molecular Basis of Supergene Mimicry in ButterfliesR01GM108626 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KRONFORST, MARCUS · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female-limited polymorphism occurs in multiple butterfly species with Batesian mimicry. While frequency-dependent selection is often argued as the driving force behind polymorphism in Batesian mimicry systems, male preference and alternative female mating strategies may also influence the maintenance of multiple female forms. Through a series of behavioural assays with the female-limited Batesian mimetic butterfly Papilio polytes, we show that males prefer stationary mimetic females over stationary non-mimetic females, but weigh female activity levels more heavily than female wing pattern when choosing between active mimetic and active non-mimetic females. Male preference for mimetic vs. non-mimetic females is independent of male genotype at the locus responsible for the female wing pattern, the autosomal gene doublesex. However male genotype does influence their response to active females. Male emphasis on female behaviour instead of appearance may reduce sexual selection pressures on female morphology, thereby facilitating frequency-dependent natural selection due to predation risk and toxic model abundance.

Indexed as

Biological MimicryMating Preference, AnimalPolymorphism, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsButterfliesFemaleMaleSelection, GeneticWings, AnimalBalancing selectionIntrasexual competitionLepidopteraMale preferenceMate choiceMultiple signals

Identifiers

PMID29471021
PMCPMC5877418
OpenAlexW2790728422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.