Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29470737›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2018

The safety of iloprost in systemic sclerosis in a real-life experience.

S Bellando-Randone, C Bruni, G Lepri, G Fiori, F Bartoli, M L Conforti, A Moggi-Pignone, S Guiducci, D Giuggioli, M Colaci and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Raynaud's phenomenon.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S Bellando-RandoneDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy. s.bellandorandone@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-6263
C BruniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
G LepriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
G FioriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
F BartoliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
M L ConfortiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
A Moggi-PignoneInternal Medicine Unit 3, Careggi University Hospital Florence, Florence, Italy.
S GuiducciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
D GiuggioliRheumatology Unit, Scleroderma Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
M ColaciRheumatology Unit, Scleroderma Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
A SpinellaRheumatology Unit, Scleroderma Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
C FerriRheumatology Unit, Scleroderma Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
M Matucci-CerinicDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence and Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iloprost (ILO) is employed intravenously for the treatment of severe Raynaud phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DU) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the intravenous treatment with ILO in different phases of SSc. Eighty-one consecutive non-selected SSc patients, all on nifedipine, with moderate RP, treated with ILO infusion, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were sub classified according to the edematous or fibrotic/atrophic cutaneous phase of the disease. ILO was infused with a progressive increase of the dosage up to the achievement of patient's tolerance, 1 day/week. In cases of slower infusion regimen due to adverse events (AE) at the beginning of the administration, patients received a lower dose of the drug (not possible to quantify precisely the final cumulative dosage). 16/81 SSc patients presented digital edema, 5 developed diarrhea, and 9 developed transient hypotension during the infusion at 20 ml/h that ameliorated when the drug was withdrawn. Moreover, 10/16 edematous patients experienced significant and painful digital swelling, unlike patients in the fibrotic group (p < 0.0001); 11/16 patients reported flushing and 7/16 headache, always controlled with dose tapering below 10 ml/h. In the atrophic/fibrotic phase patients (65/81), 10 developed diarrhea and 24 hypotension at infusion rate of 20 ml/h that led to temporary withdrawal of the drug. When ILO was restarted and kept below 10 ml/h, no side effects were experienced. 23/65 patients experienced flushing and 8/65 headache, all controlled with infusion reduction below 10 ml/h. In these patients, adverse events were significantly less frequent than in the edematous group (p = 0.023 and p = 0.008, respectively). Our data suggest that calcium channel blockers should be transitorily stopped while using ILO and that a pre-treatment approach might reduce or control adverse events. In patients with digital edema, ILO infusion should be carefully employed after the evaluation of patient's drug tolerance.

Indexed as

AdultDiarrheaFemaleFingersHumansIloprostMaleMicroscopic AngioscopyMiddle AgedRaynaud DiseaseRetrospective StudiesScleroderma, SystemicSkin UlcerTreatment OutcomeIloprostDigital edemaIloprostSafetySystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID29470737
OpenAlexW2793199227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.