Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29470681›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2018

A large-scale multiomics analysis of wheat stem solidness and the wheat stem sawfly feeding response, and syntenic associations in barley, Brachypodium, and rice.

Sezgi Biyiklioglu, Burcu Alptekin, B Ani Akpinar, Andrea C Varella, Megan L Hofland, David K Weaver, Brian Bothner, Hikmet Budak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Untargeted metabolomics profiling of oat (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MicroRNAome Profile ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sezgi BiyikliogluCereal Genomics Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Burcu AlptekinCereal Genomics Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
B Ani AkpinarCereal Genomics Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Andrea C VarellaDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Megan L HoflandWheat Stem Sawfly Laboratory, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
David K WeaverWheat Stem Sawfly Laboratory, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Brian BothnerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Hikmet BudakCereal Genomics Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA. hikmet.budak@montana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-2478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), is an important pest of wheat and other cereals, threatening the quality and quantity of grain production. WSS larvae feed and develop inside the stem where they are protected from the external environment; therefore, pest management strategies primarily rely on host plant resistance. A major locus on the long arm of wheat chromosome 3B underlies most of the variation in stem solidness; however, the impact of stem solidness on WSS feeding has not been completely characterized. Here, we used a multiomics approach to examine the response to WSS in both solid- and semi-solid-stemmed wheat varieties. The combined transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data revealed that two important molecular pathways, phenylpropanoid and phosphate pentose, are involved in plant defense against WSS. We also detected a general downregulation of several key defense transcripts, including those encoding secondary metabolites such as DIMBOA, tricetin, and lignin, which suggested that the WSS larva might interfere with plant defense. We comparatively analyzed the stem solidness genomic region known to be associated with WSS tolerance in wild emmer, durum, and bread wheats, and described syntenic regions in the close relatives barley, Brachypodium, and rice. Additionally, microRNAs identified from the same genomic region revealed potential regulatory pathways associated with the WSS response. We propose a model outlining the molecular responses of the WSS-wheat interactions. These findings provide insight into the link between stem solidness and WSS feeding at the molecular level.

Indexed as

SyntenyAnimalsBrachypodiumChromosomes, PlantHymenopteraMetabolomeOryzaPlant ImmunityPlant StemsProteomeTranscriptomeTriticumProteomeBrachypodiumHordeum vulgareInsect resistanceOryza sativaSSt1Stem solidnessTriticum aestivumWheat stem sawfly feeding

Identifiers

PMID29470681
PMCPMC5908820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.