Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29470642›Full record

ArticleLung2018

Real-World Switching to Riociguat: Management and Practicalities in Patients with PAH and CTEPH.

Henning Gall, Jean-Luc Vachiéry, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Michael Halank, Mauricio Orozco-Levi, Lisa Mielniczuk, MiKyung Chang, Kai Vogtländer, Ekkehard Grünig

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Henning GallDepartment of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Klinikstrasse 32, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Henning.Gall@innere.med.uni-giessen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7016-7373
Jean-Luc VachiéryDépartement de Cardiologie, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Nobuhiro TanabeDepartment of Respirology and Department of Advanced Medicine in Pulmonary Hypertension, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Michael HalankMedical Clinic 1/Pneumology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Mauricio Orozco-LeviHospital Internacional de Colombia, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Santander, Colombia.
Lisa MielniczukUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
MiKyung ChangBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Kai VogtländerBayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Ekkehard GrünigCenter for Pulmonary Hypertension, Thorax Clinic at the University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA proportion of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) do not achieve treatment goals or experience side effects on their current therapy. In such cases, switching patients to a new drug while discontinuing the first may be a viable and appropriate treatment option. CAPTURE was designed to investigate how physicians manage the switching of patients to riociguat in real-world clinical practice. Observations from the study were used to assess whether recommendations in the riociguat prescribing information are reflected in clinical practice.

methodsCAPTURE was an international, multicenter, uncontrolled, retrospective chart review that collected data from patients with PAH or inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH who switched to riociguat from another pulmonary hypertension (PH)-targeted medical therapy. The primary objective of the study was to understand the procedure undertaken in real-world clinical practice for patients switching to riociguat.

resultsOf 127 patients screened, 125 were enrolled in CAPTURE. The majority of patients switched from a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) to riociguat and the most common reason for switching was lack of efficacy. Physicians were already using the recommended treatment-free period when switching patients to riociguat from sildenafil, but a slightly longer period than recommended for tadalafil. In line with the contraindication, the majority of patients did not receive riociguat and PDE5i therapy concomitantly. Physicians also followed the recommended dose-adjustment procedure for riociguat.

conclusionSwitching to riociguat from another PH-targeted therapy may be feasible in real-world clinical practice in the context of the current recommendations.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDrug SubstitutionEnzyme ActivatorsFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPulmonary EmbolismPyrazolesPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesSildenafil CitrateEnzyme ActivatorsPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesriociguatSildenafil CitrateTadalafilChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionEndothelin receptor antagonistsPhosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitorsPulmonary arterial hypertensionReal-world evidenceRiociguat

Identifiers

PMID29470642
PMCPMC5942346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.