SynthesisHerz2019
Efficacy of aliskiren supplementation for heart failure : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Herz, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of Aliskiren Monotherapy (AM): an umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Renin Activity in Heart Failure with Reduced Systolic Function-New Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAliskiren might be beneficial for heart failure. However, the results of various studies are controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of aliskiren supplementation for heart failure.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of aliskiren for heart failure were included. Two investigators independently searched for articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.
resultsFive RCTs comprising 1973 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control interventions in heart failure, aliskiren supplementation was found to significantly reduce NT-proBNP levels (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.21 to -0.03 pg/ml; p = 0.008) and plasma renin activity (SMD = -0.66; 95% CI = -0.89 to -0.44 ng/ml.h; p < 0.00001) while increasing plasma renin concentration (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.30-0.75 ng/l; p < 0.00001); however, it demonstrated no significant influence on BNP levels (SMD = -0.08; 95% CI = -0.31-0.15 pg/ml; p = 0.49), mortality (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.79-1.20; p = 0.79), aldosterone levels (SMD = -0.09; 95% CI = -0.32-0.14 pmol/l; p = 0.44), adverse events (RR = 3.03; 95% CI = 0.18-49.51; p = 0.44), and serious adverse events (RR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.54-3.33; p = 0.53).
conclusionAliskiren supplementation was found to significantly decrease NT-proBNP levels and plasma renin activity and to improve plasma renin concentration in the setting of heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.