ArticlePloS one2018
A "late-but-fitter revertant cell" explains the high frequency of revertant mosaicism in epidermolysis bullosa.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epithelial competition determines gene therapy potential to suppress Fanconi Anemia oral cancer risk.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Epithelial competition determines gene therapy potential to suppress Fanconi Anemia oral cancer risk.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Revertant Mosaicism in Genodermatoses: Natural Gene Therapy Right before Your Eyes.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Revertant Mosaicism in Epidermolysis Bullosa.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Epigenetic and metabolic regulation of epidermal homeostasis.Experimental dermatology · 2021Review
- Clinical Perspectives of Gene-Targeted Therapies for Epidermolysis Bullosa.Dermatology and therapy · 2021Review
- Congenital absence of the skin secondary to the self-improving subtype of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with recurrent lesions throughout early childhood.JAAD case reports · 2021Article
- A six-attribute classification of genetic mosaicism.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Review
- Leading edge: emerging drug, cell, and gene therapies for junctional epidermolysis bullosa.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2020Review
- Revertant mosaic fibroblasts in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.The British journal of dermatology · 2019Article
- Elimination of unfit cells in young and ageing skin.Nature · 2019Article
- Somatic recombination underlies frequent revertant mosaicism in loricrin keratoderma.Life science alliance · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revertant mosaicism, or "natural gene therapy", is the phenomenon in which germline mutations are corrected by somatic events. In recent years, revertant mosaicism has been identified in all major types of epidermolysis bullosa, the group of heritable blistering disorders caused by mutations in the genes encoding epidermal adhesion proteins. Moreover, revertant mosaicism appears to be present in all patients with a specific subtype of recessive epidermolysis bullosa. We therefore hypothesized that revertant mosaicism should be expected at least in all patients with recessive forms of epidermolysis bullosa. Naturally corrected, patient-own cells are of extreme interest for their promising therapeutic potential, and their presence in all patients would open exciting, new treatment perspectives to those patients. To test our hypothesis, we determined the probability that single nucleotide reversions occur in patients' skin using a mathematical developmental model. According to our model, reverse mutations are expected to occur frequently (estimated 216x) in each patient's skin. Reverse mutations should, however, occur early in embryogenesis to be able to drive the emergence of recognizable revertant patches, which is expected to occur in only one per ~10,000 patients. This underestimate, compared to our clinical observations, can be explained by the "late-but-fitter revertant cell" hypothesis: reverse mutations arise at later stages of development, but provide revertant cells with a selective growth advantage in vivo that drives the development of recognizable healthy skin patches. Our results can be extrapolated to any other organ with stem cell division numbers comparable to skin, which may offer novel future therapeutic options for other genetic conditions if these revertant cells can be identified and isolated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.