Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29470146›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2018

Toward an effective peripheral visceral analgesic: responding to the national opioid crisis.

Michael Camilleri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Intestinal neuropod cell GUCY2C regulates visceral pain.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. What's in the pipeline for lower functional gastrointestinal disorders in the next 5 years?American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael CamilleriClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Center, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This minireiew summarizes recent new developments in visceral analgesics. This promising field is important, as a new approach to address abdominal pain with peripheral visceral analgesics is considered a key approach to addressing the current opioid crisis. Some of the novel compounds address peripheral pain mechanisms through modulation of opioid receptors via biased ligands, nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide (NOP) receptor, or dual action on NOP and μ-opioid receptor, buprenorphine and morphiceptin analogs. Other compounds target nonopioid mechanisms, including cannabinoid (CB2), N-methyl-d-aspartate, calcitonin gene-related peptide, estrogen, and adenosine A

Indexed as

AnalgesicsVisceral PainAbdominal PainCannabinoidsHumansReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, OpioidVisceraAnalgesicsCannabinoidsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Opioidcannabinoidestrogenreceptorstransient receptor potential

Identifiers

PMID29470146
PMCPMC6032061
OpenAlexW2788074114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.