ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019
Radiation repair models for clinical application.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Time-Dependent Recovery to Improve Esophagitis Prediction in Thoracic Reirradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Deviations from the inverse relationship between tumor and normal tissue dose and RBE in fast neutron data are compatible with the presence of hypoxia, with possible applications to hypo-fractionated proton therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cellular responses to targeted radionuclide therapy: rethinking radiobiology under continuous low dose rates.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Do we need dosimetry for the optimization of theranostics in CNS tumors?Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- A stochastic model of blood flow to calculate blood dose during radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Modelling a new approach for radio-ablation after resection of breast ductal carcinoma in-situ based on the BAT-90 medical device.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Use of radiobiology in medical jurisprudence, with particular reference to delays in diagnosis and therapeutic onset.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer toPhysics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of newly emerging clinical techniques involve non-conventional patterns of radiation delivery which require an appreciation of the role played by radiation repair phenomena. This review outlines the main models of radiation repair, focussing on those which are of greatest clinical usefulness and which may be incorporated into biologically effective dose assessments. The need to account for the apparent "slowing-down" of repair rates observed in some normal tissues is also examined, along with a comparison of the relative merits of the formulations which can be used to account for such phenomena. Jack Fowler brought valuable insight to the understanding of radiation repair processes and this article includes reference to his important contributions in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.