Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29470098›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Large datasets, logistics, sharing and workflow in screening.

Tessa S Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tessa S CookPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-7267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer screening initiatives exist around the world for different malignancies, most frequently breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer. A number of cancer registries exist to collect relevant data, but while these data may include imaging findings, they rarely, if ever, include actual images. Additionally, the data submitted to the registry are usually correlated with eventual cancer diagnoses and patient outcomes, rather than used with the individual's future screenings. Developing screening programs that allow for images to be submitted to a central location in addition to patient meta data and used for comparison to future screening exams would be very valuable in increasing access to care and ensuring that individuals are effectively screened at appropriate intervals. It would also change the way imaging results and additional patient data are correlated to eventual outcomes. However, it introduces logistical challenges surrounding secure storage and transmission of data to subsequent screening sites. In addition, in the absence of standardized protocols for screening, comparing current and prior imaging, especially from different equipment, can be challenging. Implementing a large-scale screening program with an image-enriched screening registry-effectively, an image-enriched electronic screening record-also requires that incentives exist for screening sites, physicians, and patients to participate; to maximize coverage, participation may have to be supported by government agencies. Workflows will also have to be adjusted to support registry participation for all screening patients in an effort to create a large, robust data set that can be used for future screening efforts as well as research initiatives.center.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicDiagnostic ImagingInformation DisseminationWorkflowEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningRegistries

Identifiers

PMID29470098
PMCPMC6350485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.