Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29469943›Full record

Observational studyJournal of veterinary internal medicine2018

Effects of Diagnostic Work-Up on Medical Decision-Making for Canine Urinary Tract Infection: An Observational Study in Danish Small Animal Practices.

T M Sørensen, C R Bjørnvad, G Cordoba, P Damborg, L Guardabassi, V Siersma, L Bjerrum, L R Jessen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive phage therapy forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of a rapid immunoassay for bacteriuria in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

T M SørensenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-4970
C R BjørnvadDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
G CordobaThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
P DamborgDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
L GuardabassiDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
V SiersmaThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
L BjerrumThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
L R JessenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical signs of urinary tract disease in dogs often lead to prescription of antibiotics. Appropriate diagnostic work-up could optimize treatment and reduce the risk of inappropriate use of antibiotics. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesTo describe and evaluate the impact of diagnostic work-up on decision to treat (DTT) and choice of antibiotic treatment (COT) for dogs presenting with clinical signs of urinary tract disease. ANIMALS: One hundred and fifty-one dogs presenting to 52 Danish veterinary practices.

methodsProspective, observational study. Clinical signs, diagnostic work-up, and prescriptions were recorded. Urine samples were submitted to a reference laboratory for quantitative bacterial culture (QBC) and susceptibility testing. The laboratory results were used as reference for assessing the appropriateness of DTT and COT.

resultsIn the majority of dogs, veterinarians performed dipstick (99%), microscopic examination of urine (80%) and bacterial culture (56%). Fifty-one percent of dogs had urinary tract infection (UTI) based on reference QBC. Appropriate DTT was made for 62% of the dogs, while 36% were over-prescribed and 2% under-prescribed. Inappropriate use of second-line agents was found in 57% of the UTI cases. Performing microscopy-but not culture-significantly impacted DTT (P = 0.039) while no difference was seen in COT (P = 0.67). The accuracy of in-house microscopy and culture were 64.5 and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Over-prescription of antibiotics was common among dogs with suspected UTI, regardless of the diagnostic work-up performed. Test inaccuracy under practice conditions and incoherence between diagnostic test results and decision-making both explained inappropriate and unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Decision-MakingDenmarkDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReagent StripsUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsReagent StripsAntibiotic prescriptionBacterial cultureDogMicroscopyPrimary practiceUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID29469943
PMCPMC5867017
OpenAlexW2793544490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.