Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29469653›Full record

ArticlemAbs2018

Analytical similarity assessment of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 to reference medicinal product.

Kyoung Hoon Lee, Jihun Lee, Jin Soo Bae, Yeon Jung Kim, Hyun Ah Kang, Sung Hwan Kim, So Jung Lee, Ki Jung Lim, Jung Woo Lee, Soon Kwan Jung and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Impact of N-Linked Glycosylation on Therapeutic Proteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar Products: Insight from an Integrated Health Care System.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proteomics for cancer drug design.Expert review of proteomics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kyoung Hoon Leea Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
Jihun Leea Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8803-7689
Jin Soo Baea Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7484-9048
Yeon Jung Kima Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
Hyun Ah Kanga Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
Sung Hwan Kima Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
So Jung Leea Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
Ki Jung Lima Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
Jung Woo Leea Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0692-7742
Soon Kwan Junga Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.
Shin Jae Changa Biotechnology Research Institute, R&D Division, Celltrion Inc. , Incheon , Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT-P10 (Truxima™) was recently approved as the world's first rituximab biosimilar product in the European Union (EU) and South Korea. To demonstrate biosimilarity of CT-P10 with the reference medicinal product (RMP), extensive 3-way similarity assessment has been conducted between CT-P10, EU-Rituximab and US-Rituximab, focusing on the physicochemical and biological quality attributes. A multitude of state-of-the-art analyses revealed that CT-P10 has identical primary and higher order structures compared to the original product. Purity/impurity profiles of CT-P10 measured by the levels of aggregates, fragments, non-glycosylated form and process-related impurities were also found to be comparable with those of RMPs. In terms of the post-translational modification, CT-P10 contains slightly less N-terminal pyro-glutamate variant, which has been known not to affect product efficacy or safety. Oligosaccharide profiling has revealed that, although CT-P10 contains the same conserved glycan species and relative proportion with the RMPs, the content of total afucosylated glycan in CT-P10 was slightly higher than in EU- or US-Rituximab. Nevertheless, the effect of the observed level of afucosylation in CT-P10 drug product on Fc receptor binding affinity or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity was found to be negligible based on the spiking study with highly afucosylated sample. Arrays of biological assays representative of known and putative mechanisms of action for rituximab have shown that biological activities of CT-P10 are within the quality range of RMPs. Recent results of clinical studies have further confirmed that the CT-P10 exhibits equivalent clinical efficacy and safety profiles compared to EU- and US-Rituximab. The current 3-way similarity assessment together with clinical study results confidently demonstrate that CT-P10 is highly similar with EU- and US-Rituximab in terms of physicochemical properties, biological activities, efficacy, and safety for its final approval as a biosimilar product.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug ApprovalHumansReference StandardsRituximabAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCT-P10RituximabbiosimilarCT-P10reference medicinal product (RMP)rituximabTruxima™

Identifiers

PMID29469653
PMCPMC5916562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.