ArticlemAbs2018
Analytical similarity assessment of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 to reference medicinal product.
Article in mAbs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term efficacy and safety of CT-P10 or rituximab in untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: a randomized phase 3 study.Blood advances · 2021Trial
- Multimodal mass spectrometric characterization of structural microheterogeneity in rituximab reference and biosimilars.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2025Article
- Assessing the Comparability of Degradation Profiles Between Biosimilar and Originator Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibodies Under Thermal Stress.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biosimilars: A Critical Review of Development, Regulatory Landscape, and Clinical Implications.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Thermostability and binding properties of single-chained Fv fragments derived from therapeutic antibodies.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Basic regulatory science behind drug substance and drug product specifications of monoclonal antibodies and other protein therapeutics.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024Review
- Assessment of monoclonal antibody glycosylation: a comparative study using HRMS, NMR, and HILIC-FLD.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Impact of N-Linked Glycosylation on Therapeutic Proteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Novel Bootstrapping Test for Analytical Biosimilarity.The AAPS journal · 2022Article
- Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar Products: Insight from an Integrated Health Care System.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Article
- Analytical Similarity Assessment of Biosimilars: Global Regulatory Landscape, Recent Studies and Major Advancements in Orthogonal Platforms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Assessment of Functional Characterization and Comparability of Biotherapeutics: a Review.The AAPS journal · 2021Review
- Glycan Profile Analysis of Engineered Trastuzumab with Rationally Added Glycosylation Sequons Presents Significantly Increased Glycan Complexity.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- GH18 endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases use distinct mechanisms to process hybrid-type N-linked glycans.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021Article
- Biosimilar or Not: Physicochemical and Biological Characterization of MabThera and Its Two Biosimilar Candidates.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2021Article
- LC-MS based case-by-case analysis of the impact of acidic and basic charge variants of bevacizumab on stability and biological activity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation Analysis of Marketed Rituximab Drug Product Size Distribution.Pharmaceutical research · 2020Article
- On the Aggregation and Nucleation Mechanism of the Monoclonal Antibody Anti-CD20 Near Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation (LLPS).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Biologicals and Biosimilars in Hematology: The Case of Rituximab.HemaSphere · 2019Article
- Proteomics for cancer drug design.Expert review of proteomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CT-P10 (Truxima™) was recently approved as the world's first rituximab biosimilar product in the European Union (EU) and South Korea. To demonstrate biosimilarity of CT-P10 with the reference medicinal product (RMP), extensive 3-way similarity assessment has been conducted between CT-P10, EU-Rituximab and US-Rituximab, focusing on the physicochemical and biological quality attributes. A multitude of state-of-the-art analyses revealed that CT-P10 has identical primary and higher order structures compared to the original product. Purity/impurity profiles of CT-P10 measured by the levels of aggregates, fragments, non-glycosylated form and process-related impurities were also found to be comparable with those of RMPs. In terms of the post-translational modification, CT-P10 contains slightly less N-terminal pyro-glutamate variant, which has been known not to affect product efficacy or safety. Oligosaccharide profiling has revealed that, although CT-P10 contains the same conserved glycan species and relative proportion with the RMPs, the content of total afucosylated glycan in CT-P10 was slightly higher than in EU- or US-Rituximab. Nevertheless, the effect of the observed level of afucosylation in CT-P10 drug product on Fc receptor binding affinity or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity was found to be negligible based on the spiking study with highly afucosylated sample. Arrays of biological assays representative of known and putative mechanisms of action for rituximab have shown that biological activities of CT-P10 are within the quality range of RMPs. Recent results of clinical studies have further confirmed that the CT-P10 exhibits equivalent clinical efficacy and safety profiles compared to EU- and US-Rituximab. The current 3-way similarity assessment together with clinical study results confidently demonstrate that CT-P10 is highly similar with EU- and US-Rituximab in terms of physicochemical properties, biological activities, efficacy, and safety for its final approval as a biosimilar product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.